[meteorite-list] 240 pound SHREWSBURY "Meteor"
From: Sterling K. Webb <sterling_k_webb_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 20:18:51 -0500 Message-ID: <0c7601c78f7c$824ba260$f54de146_at_ATARIENGINE> Hi, Rob, List, Loss of mass by ablation varies with the speed of the "incoming" object, the faster the more rapid the loss. This is probably why "cometary" material has never produced a meteorite on the ground that we know of. In theory, ablation should increase with the square of the velocity, but there are so many other factors, that's only an approximation. A steeper descent doesn't help; generally, it increases the ablative loss. Most of the mass of a meteoroid is going to end up in the dust trail as ablation slows it. If the meteoroid breaks up, the smaller pieces will slow down more quickly and that may reduce the total ablative loss, if the breakup is not too early nor too late. A 90% loss is probably more like the minimum... Whoops! Just saw Chris's post. I will just point at it and finish up with --- "What he said..." Sterling K. Webb -------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: rob szep To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2007 12:30 PM Subject: [meteorite-list] 240 pound SHREWSBURY "Meteor" Pleasant greetings fellow list-members... In reading the posting to the "list" regarding the "SHREWSBURY HOME-COMING" I was a bit surprized to see the claim that according to scientists 90% of a METEOR is LOST during atmospheric passage, meaning the Shrewsbury meteor was 240 pounds in weight as it entered our atmosphere... I'm not buying it... Ablation MIGHT result in a ~15% weight loss but that hypothetical 90% guess - which is all it is - sounds a wee-bit excessive to me. Anyone else care to share their thoughts on the matter? "Zep", over & out... Received on Sat 05 May 2007 09:18:51 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |