[meteorite-list] Rosetta Stone Analogy

From: Peter Marmet <p.marmet_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:52:24 +0200
Message-ID: <CA618725-3D4B-47D7-9234-710085BA22F5_at_mysunrise.ch>

Hello Norbert, Adam, Marcin and All,

it seems I didn't make myself very clear. I have absolutely nothing
against the term:
This one is kind of a Rosetta Stone for this and this...or some sort
of a Missing Link...or some
kind of a Smoking Gun for...but what makes me feel similar as Marcin,
was the following:

The finders sold their NWA 908 for years under the name NWA
908...suddenly NWA 908 is THE(!) Rosetta Stone
which means THE ONE AND ONLY....

...ok, the main reason why I wrote this e-mail
was to get more info about this rather special / stunning /
fantastic / one of it's kind lithology story!
... Adam wrote: that displays two (2) lithologies
...Norbert wrote: displaying three (3) distinct lithologies

Very interested to hear more about this unique meteorite...
not very keen to hear more about what names are legal / honest /
ethical and
which are not...sorry, if I started this debate!

Peter




Norbert Classen wrote:

> Dear Marcin,
>
> I didn't use that term for marketing reasons, and it is not a
> synonym for
> Dhofar 908 in general but I just used it for the 81g main mass of
> Dhofar
> 908, displaying three distinct lithologies linking previous finds
> together.
> That's why I called it a Rosetta stone. Back in 2003 virtually
> nobody was
> willing to believe that e.g. Dhofar 489, and Dhofar 305 did belong
> to one
> and the same (ancient) fall. That's not the same thing as calling
> it "Donald
> Duck", it's a linguistic ploy to express something of scientific
> meaning...
> Do you think Baker and Bizzaro used their analogy as a marketing
> ploy, or
> just because the liked the funny name?
>
> BTW, as to my knowledge neither Adam nor I did use the Rosetta
> stone analogy
> without making it very clear that we were talking about Dhofar 908,
> not in
> general, but in respect to a certain stone/fragment of Dhofar 908,
> and its
> special history/properties.
>
> And, as for the monetary "value" of certain specimens: do you think
> that a
> specimen of, let's say normal Zagami will demand the same resale
> price as a
> specimen with dual lithologies, including the DML (dark mottled
> lithology)
> of Zagami? You are correct, the "meteorite will stay the same", but
> I fear
> you won't get the latter one, cheap. And: if you know of a source
> who sells
> dual-lith Zagami at the price of normal Zagami, just give me a
> call :-)
>
> My 3 lithologies,
> Norbert
>
> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com
> [mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von
> PolandMET
> Gesendet: Montag, 4. Juni 2007 00:01
> An: Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Rosetta Stone Analogy
>
> Dear list members.
> Every meteorite is special.
>
> For me is better to call meteorite with his official name even if
> this is
> ugly NWA 9999999 name, than create some unreal "marketing" names
> that have
> nothing to do with meteorites. I see only one reason for this,
> better sales
> becouse of better name. If we call it Rosetta Stone, Louis
> Michelle or
> Donald Duck or Shrek, meteorite will stay the same and not become more
> importand or rare.
>
> Thats my two CH3nt's
>
> -----[ MARCIN CIMALA ]-----[ I.M.C.A.#3667 ]-----
> http://www.Meteoryt.net marcin at meteoryt.net
> http://www.PolandMET.com marcin at polandmet.com
> http://www.Gao-Guenie.com GSM +48(607)535 195
> --------[ Member of Polish Meteoritical Society ]--------
>
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
Received on Mon 04 Jun 2007 10:52:24 AM PDT