[meteorite-list] New information from Nomenclature re: provisional names and numbers
From: wahlperry at aol.com <wahlperry_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:24:28 -0400 Message-ID: <8C94A6D02D8AC4F-F44-67F0_at_mblk-r17.sysops.aol.com> Dear List, I am sending this email in response to an ongoing thread regarding provisional names and numbers for new finds. I hope this puts an end to the thread. I have contacted the Nomenclature regarding this issue and received the following response. >Dear Sonny, >Thanks for your phone message as well as this email. > You can look up the committee membership and the rules and guidelines on the Meteoritical Society website. >The Committee has no requirements regarding getting provisional numbers within a fixed time. In fact there is no requirement to get a provisional >number at all. If you want to just submit a meteorite at the time it is classified that is fine. Similarly, there is no time requirement for submitting a >new find. When fragments are clearly paired it is fine to include them all in the same number. >I hope this clarifies things. I hope this will end the harassment from Mr. Bob Verish and Team Verish. As you can see I have done nothing wrong in the delay of getting provisonal numbers and names for all of my new finds. I have chosen to complete field study work before aquiring any provisional names or numbers. Below is an excerpt from one of Bob's emails. >Guess I'm just jealous that Sonny gets to do things >his way, and I'm forced to abide by "guidelines". http://www.meteorite-times.com ( Nevada Picture Of The Day) The last 2 months have been focused negativley on my finds. Thanks, Sonny ________________________________________________________________________ AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. Received on Wed 11 Apr 2007 12:24:28 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |