[meteorite-list] labelling

From: Martin Horejsi <accretiondesk_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:58:51 -0700
Message-ID: <9c2f96d20611161458p4dc60024yfb12d5a868f35137_at_mail.gmail.com>

Hi all,

Dave mentioned a "distinct format." One of the things I do with my
cards is to have my name appear between the meteorite name and the
rest of the information. The reason I do this is becasue I was tired
of receiving specimens that came with an original specimen lable
except the dealer name (such as the AMM, AML, NEMS, etc.) was cut off
the bottom of the card possibly in an attempt to reduce the
competition among dealers.

Cheers,

Martin


On 11/16/06, Dave Harris <entropydave at ntlworld.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am totally guilty of bad labelling - I love to get labels with my space
> rocks but I rarely do my own - mainly because I can't find a distinctive
> format, nice heavy paper labels and because I am damned lazy and I guess
> that I do not put any importance on my own ownership/provenance on my pieces
>
>
> I think that I should systematically start generating decent labels a la
> Mark Ford's recommendation.
>
> Best!
> dave
> IMCA #0092
> Sec.BIMS
> www.bimsociety.org
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
Received on Thu 16 Nov 2006 05:58:51 PM PST