[meteorite-list] RE: Doing the rounds
From: Sterling K. Webb <sterling_k_webb_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri May 5 01:53:15 2006 Message-ID: <005001c67008$30e374a0$a628e146_at_ATARIENGINE> Martin, List, Martin wrote: > ...recently I read in two independent articles that in mediaeval > times people would have thought and church taught, that the > Earth would be a flat disk, cause a round world would have > been inconsistent with the bible. What an incredible rubbish!! > (that prejudice about the disk firstly appeared in 17th century). Well, Martin, I hate to tell you, but it is NOT TRUE that it is a modern prejudice that the Church taught that the world was flat. The Early Father Lactantius wrote extensively against the rotundity of the Earth from 302 AD to 323 AD and promoted a flat Earth with a "box lid" of the heavens over it, the "Tabernacle Earth." By the mid-Fourth century, the vast majority if the patristic fathers were opposed to a spherical Earth, a long list: Cyril of Jerusalem, Diodorus of Tarsus, Philoponus, St. Jerome... But the chief promulgator of Flat-Earthism was Cosmas. Cosmas Indicopleustes ('India-voyager') of Alexandria was a Greek sailor in the early 6th century who traveled to Ethiopia, India and Sri Lanka. He then became a monk and before 550 AD wrote a strange book, copiously illustrated. There can be few books which have attracted more derision than the Christian Topography of Cosmas Indicopleustes. It advances the idea that the world is flat, and that the heavens form the shape of a box with a curved lid. The author cites passages of scripture (inaccurately) to support his thesis, and attempts to argue down the idea of a spherical earth by stigmatizing it as 'pagan.' Cosmas was basically a poorly-educated crank (internet-style) but through him Christianity was solidified into supporting the idea of the flat-earth. In defense, let it be said that Christians and pagans did not as such hold different views about the shape of the world. It was a subject on which there was no certainty of knowledge for the common man of the ancient world. It was "cutting edge," like Relativity, and as little understood. And by the fourth century, knowledge was decaying away at a rapid rate, without any more help from Christians than from any of a host of causes. Cosmas' book is not without some value. There was trade between the Roman Empire and India, but Cosmas was no doubt the only writer who had actually made the journey. He traveled the Red Sea coast, and as far as Taprobane (Ceylon, modern Sri Lanka), and he describes some of what he saw, and even drew pictures of strange animals in his autograph manuscript. Away from his whacky theory, Cosmas is both interesting and reliable. It was this content that made the work was immensely popular in the Dark Ages (much as Mandeville's Travels were in the Middle Ages), but it carried his cosmology along with it. You can read the complete text of "Christian Topography" at: http://www.ccel.org/p/pearse/morefathers/cosmas_01_book1.htm if you want laugh and groan. Isidore of Seville (600-635 AD), very erudite, discusses a variety of theories without really deciding which is right, but most writers of the seventh century stuck with a Flat-Earth model the Babylonians had proven erroneous 3000 years before! Starting with the ninth century, Greek writing, preserved in Ireland, begins to seep slowly back into the Christian West. Bacon and Aquinas may have known about the Ptolemaic theory but they did not write about it. But it is not until 1256 AD that the first short and sketchy account of the Ptolemaic system appears in a European language, just a few pages. And the full exposition of a geocentric spherical Earth would wait until early- to mid-fifteenth century for full publication. The importance of celestial navigation in Europe's expansion toward gobbling up the planet (Hey! Somebody had to do it!) was the chief impetus for pushing for greater accuracy and understanding that would lead us to Copernicus, Tycho Brahe, Kepler, Galileo, and all the rest of that story... Sterling K. Webb ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Martin Altmann" <altmann_at_meteorite-martin.de> To: <Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>; "'Rob McCafferty'" <rob_mccafferty_at_yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 7:26 PM Subject: AW: [meteorite-list] RE: Doing the rounds In fact without the church, we really would live in a dark age nowadays. Smth which is always forgotten, as the discipline of History of Science is mainly philology, a branch which since decades isn't directly en vogue. For a period of about 800 years the church was the only institution collecting knowledge, doing science and educating students. And nowadays we wouldn't for sure live in such a technically and scientifically developed (socially I'm not so sure) world, if there wasn't done the enormous transfer of knowledge by the clerics in mediaeval times of the classical sciences, which the Islamic scientist rescued and enlarged. Already before 1000 A.D. the first Arabian texts (btw. Astronomical treaties) were translated to Latin by monks, take as an example the manual for using the planispheric astrolabe by Gerbert d'Aurillac (950 - 1003), the later pope Sylvester II. and in the main stream later in 13.th century it was of course also the church, who cared for translating and spread the scientific literature from islamic occupied Spain, mainly with the help of Mozarabs and bilingual jewish savants. Copernicus, Brahe, Kepler weren't isolated ingenious solitaires, they founded on a tradition and a 600 years lasting history of ideas, collected and taught by the scholars of the church. Without church no antique knowledge, no renaissance, no reconnaissance, no modern science. It is astonishing to me, how few is taught today about those for the development of the occident most important period in history on universities. For astronomers & physicists science starts with Newton, as science would fall suddenly like an apple from a tree and the philologists, who could read the texts, rather like to occupy with novels about knights and stuff, and the normal consumers see on cinema Giordano burning, a pissed-off Gallilei sitting in his villa, or think, that Columbus' achievement beside of the enormous size of his nose was, that he didn't fell off from the disk or are lost in the mists of Avalon. Imagine, recently I read in two independent articles in the largest German astronomy (one was from a Prof. of physics) magazine, that in mediaeval times people would have thought and church taught, that the Earth would be a flat disk, cause a round world would have been inconsistent with the bible. What an incredible rubbish!! (that prejudice about the disk firstly appeared in 17th century). Buckleboo Martin -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: meteorite-list-bounces_at_meteoritecentral.com [mailto:meteorite-list-bounces_at_meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von Rob McCafferty Gesendet: Freitag, 5. Mai 2006 00:23 An: britishandirishmeteoritesociety_at_yahoogroups.com; meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com Betreff: [meteorite-list] RE: Doing the rounds Don't worry about getting excommunicated. They can't do that unless you're already a member. Though maybe you are. Incidentally, the Vatican's position has softened tremendously in the last few years. BBC Radio Scotland had the Vatican's Meteorite representative on at about 830am this morning. I didn't even know they had one of the worlds largest meteorite collections let alone a representative to talk about it. I missed a lot of it because out on this island, the reception isn't great and it's even worse since I tore the ariel off the roof putting my car in a ditch a couple of months back. What I did pick up was that they agree with the scientists over the age of the Earth and theologically speaking, they have no problem with any of the theories over the creation of the universe or even the concept of life on other planets. Galileo has had 10 years to recover from the burns of hell now so I'm sure he feels pretty vindicated. House arrest isn't so bad, not if you've got a telescope, a microscope, some meteorites and the internet so he must have enjoyed it about 25% by my maths. As a scientist who is a Christian, a lot of people as me about the church changing it's stance over Galileo. I tend to be rather glib in my response. The wittiest repost is along the lines of, "He got out of Hell on appeal which is no surprise because guess where all the lawyers are" It's a larf innit? Rob McC __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list Received on Fri 05 May 2006 01:53:10 AM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |