[meteorite-list] Re:Comet hit Britain in mid sixth century, AD?
From: Paul Barford <pbarford_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri Jul 21 13:00:55 2006 Message-ID: <010a01c6ace7$13bfd640$1f85cf57_at_chello.pl> > Baileys comet impact hypothesis is quite contested, it certainly is not an > accepted main stream hypothesis. So I was quite surprised by the tone of that > newspaper clipping that suggested so. The astrophysicist supporting it are, by > the way, astrophysicists with a known fetish for impacts as a source for every > historical change. Thanks Marco, In general, I think the theory is very dubious. The guy was trying to explain how small numbers of Anglo-Saxon migrants replaced a much larger indigenous Celtic/British population both genetically and linguistically. But if the Britons were dying off in the 530s because of poor crop yields and cold nights or whatever caused by cometary dust in the atmosphere, then the Anglo-Saxons would too. Unless of course somebody postulates an actual impact which wiped out a large part of the (British) population on the west side of the island, but was survived by larger numbers on the east which is where the Anglo-Saxons were. But then that's not a good model either, because Ireland is where it would have hit... and there is no evidence of such an event from there. Just as a matter of interest if someone has time to fiddle with it, what parameters would such a hypothetical body have to have to kill people within a radius of 300 km (so along the whole western coast of England and Wales) but leave those beyond still alive? [I could not get the Arizona Earth Impact Effects Program http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/impacteffects/ to give the result I wanted - just curious]. Paul Barford Received on Fri 21 Jul 2006 12:59:48 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |