[meteorite-list] Re: Planet V (for Five, and not for Velikovsky)

From: Robert Verish <bolidechaser_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sun Apr 30 13:41:32 2006
Message-ID: <20060429000307.6997.qmail_at_web51702.mail.yahoo.com>

Hello List,

Just wanted to agree with what Rob said and to add
that this List would sorely miss the thought-provoking
posts by Sterling K. Webb, were he to decide to go to
a more receptive discusson group to share his
insights. Can't always read and respond in time to
posts to this List (and I really wanted to make that
joke about the connection between Planet V and Planet
Velikovsky;-).

Just wanted to thank Sterling for all the research
time and effort that he puts into each of his posts.
Would rather speak-up now, than wish I had said
something sooner.

Bob V.

---------------- Original Message ------------------
[meteorite-list] Planet V (for Five)
Rob McCafferty
Thu Apr 27 17:12:08 EDT 2006


Hello list

For those people recently who were harping on about
the
apparent disintegration of this list, this is an
example of the sort of gem which I find make it all
worth while.

I like a lot of what is in this post and wish I had
the celestial mechanics ability (and time too) to work
on it (With a healthy dollop of simulation programming
thrown in too)

I will restrict myself to one thought to raise
regarding this topic and this is; Did all trace of
this planet disappear? Does anyone have any idea where
NWA3133 may fit into the picture?

Rob McCafferty
-- "Sterling K. Webb" <sterling_k_webb at
sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
>
> Hi, List,
>
> With several stories being posted about the new
> research on lunar return samples showing that there
> was indeed a Late Heavy Bombardment with a sharp
> peak after a quiet period, instead of the Final
> Flurry of an ongoing bombardment, I realized that
the
> Planet V hypothesis put forward several years ago to

> account for the LHB also ties in with several other
> new developments.
>
Received on Fri 28 Apr 2006 08:03:07 PM PDT