[meteorite-list] Re: Minimum crater size for central uplift ?
From: Kevin Forbes <vk3ukf_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Mon Nov 14 12:09:41 2005 Message-ID: <BAY113-F19C7F7DB05CA0BF3D6CAD4995A0_at_phx.gbl> I remember reading an article not too long ago that provided much info on this, as well as a formula that might predict various outcomes, depending on which body in our solar system you were interested. I could not find it on my HDD, so I did a search on google for 'impact central uplift formula' http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=impact+central+uplift+formula&meta= and found this, it provides the formula. http://www.bookrags.com/sciences/earthscience/impact-crater-woes-01.html There is a fair amout of other good reading provided by the search. All the best, Kevin. >From: "Charles O'Dale" <codale0806_at_rogers.com> >To: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com> >Subject: [meteorite-list] Re: Minimum crater size for central uplift ? >Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 15:25:01 -0400 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from six.pairlist.net ([209.68.2.254]) by mc10-f1.hotmail.com >with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sun, 13 Nov 2005 11:24:54 -0800 >Received: from six.pairlist.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])by six.pairlist.net >(Postfix) with ESMTPid 9B75E8CA42; Sun, 13 Nov 2005 14:24:53 -0500 (EST) >Received: from mu.pair.com (mu.pair.com [209.68.1.23])by six.pairlist.net >(Postfix) with SMTP id 947CA8C95Ffor ><meteorite-list_at_lists6.meteoritecentral.com>;Sun, 13 Nov 2005 14:24:52 >-0500 (EST) >Received: (qmail 25016 invoked by uid 7111); 13 Nov 2005 19:24:52 -0000 >Received: (qmail 25013 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2005 19:24:52 -0000 >Received: from mailwash5.pair.com (66.39.2.5)by mu.pair.com with SMTP; 13 >Nov 2005 19:24:52 -0000 >Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])by mailwash5.pair.com >(Postfix) with SMTP id 6D8E58D623for ><meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>;Sun, 13 Nov 2005 14:24:51 -0500 (EST) >Received: from smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com >(smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com[206.190.36.82])by mailwash5.pair.com >(Postfix) with SMTP id 49BD28D65Efor ><meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>;Sun, 13 Nov 2005 14:24:51 -0500 (EST) >Received: (qmail 33104 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2005 19:24:51 -0000 >Received: from unknown (HELO mdguo5m3tdnvnv) >(voltage?contrast_at_24.43.121.118with login)by smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com >with SMTP; 13 Nov 2005 19:24:51 -0000 >X-Message-Info: +4Ohsb/xAqltwBu07j5E87VkCDebyeKbSi+PdcKTMsg= >X-Original-To: meteorite-list_at_lists6.meteoritecentral.com >Delivered-To: meteorite-list_at_six.pairlist.net >Delivered-To: >arthur-meteoritecentral:com-meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com >DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; >d=rogers.com;h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE;b=OTgKBSWDkZTunsqY3FUxVU43RHe0gwckVv40tnfK1mv5t5TgQyF1zzS1QXV63gm6+m1o5CHTbBVvBIYVMpRBrJJf5VWbX2wvTskQHyOB2Rmt7V12Uk5R+3bFM7p0Qjr21St8rG497g5qEoCg/Q5JSfwMJWy+x5iFoOmVAGHL51s=; >References: <20051113171558.060A68D0AC_at_six.pairlist.net> >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 >X-BeenThere: meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com >X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 >Precedence: list >List-Id: Meteorite Discussion Forum <meteorite-list.meteoritecentral.com> >List-Unsubscribe: ><http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list>,<mailto:meteorite-list-request_at_meteoritecentral.com?subject=unsubscribe> >List-Archive: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/meteorite-list> >List-Post: <mailto:meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com> >List-Help: ><mailto:meteorite-list-request_at_meteoritecentral.com?subject=help> >List-Subscribe: ><http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list>,<mailto:meteorite-list-request_at_meteoritecentral.com?subject=subscribe> >Errors-To: meteorite-list-bounces_at_meteoritecentral.com >Return-Path: meteorite-list-bounces_at_meteoritecentral.com >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Nov 2005 19:24:54.0366 (UTC) >FILETIME=[ECF55FE0:01C5E887] > >Michel: > >IMHO, "it all depends". From my research, the best I could come up with: > >quoted from my web-site: >http://www.ottawa.rasc.ca/astronomy/earth_craters/intro.html > >"In this article, I will present the craters that I have explored in the >order of their size, starting with simple craters, moving to complex >craters and finishing with multiring basins. The transition size between >simple to complex craters is 2km in sediments and 4km in crystalline rocks. >The transition size between complex to ringed basin craters is 10 to 50 >km." > >I would love more input on this. > >Thanks >Charles O'Dale >Meeting Chair >Ottawa RASC >http://www.ottawa.rasc.ca/astronomy/earth_craters/index.html > > > > >>Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 17:05:06 +0100 >>From: "michel FRANCO" <michel_at_caillou-noir.com> >>Subject: [meteorite-list] Minimum crater size for central uplift ? >>To: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com> >>Message-ID: <000101c5e86c$03ac1b50$2101a8c0_at_your6da8e58346> >>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >>Dear list >> >>I was wandering what is the minimum size of terrestrial impact crater >>that show a central uplift. >>Best regards >> >>Michel FRANCO >>IMCA 3869 >> >> > >______________________________________________ >Meteorite-list mailing list >Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com >http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list Received on Mon 14 Nov 2005 12:09:37 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |