[meteorite-list] [FS - ebay] picritic shergotite endecut

From: joseph_town_at_att.net <joseph_town_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sat May 7 10:09:16 2005
Message-ID: <050720051409.26376.427CCC3200088EBC0000670821602813020299019BA1089F0A9C0106_at_att.net>

Adam,

Shut down, get out and treasure hunt. Your attempt at logic had me going until you lost control and used the word tactics. Submit a brain sample to an authorized institution upon your ultimate demise, if they'll accept it.

Bill

 
 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "Martin Altmann" <Altmann_at_Meteorite-Martin.de>
> Uh, it's May, spring on Earth (but not for Norbert, Jeff and Rodrigo) and
> please not the number war again!
> Hey, there was this long (and for most list members I guess somehat boring)
> argue, when people sold stuff under your number, whether it was the same
> material or not.....that wasn't o.k..
> But what do you want more in this case?
> He made microprobe, if the values are sufficient for comparing and the same
> like with yours, if it's from the same source and if it's the very same
> stuff -
> to inflate the number mess would be contraproductive for collectors and
> science.
>
> Come on, now. Especially where the desert gets dry, I have the vision, that
> dealers will buy each one 150 stones, which are NWA 869 and even if the
> values, the data (and for the crazy ones the microprobe) shows, that indeed
> it's NWA869, they will make twothousand new NWA-numbers out of it, vulgo
> 2000 new meteorites.
> Would be that serious in your eyes?
>
> My two beers.
> Martin
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Adam Hupe" <raremeteorites_at_comcast.net>
> To: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
> Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2005 5:08 AM
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] [FS - ebay] picritic shergotite endecut
>
>
> > Stan,
> >
> > If it has been officially microprobed, why didn't you get your own number
> > assignment? I do not like your insinuations that NWA 1110 wasn't properly
> > studied. When making a pairing conclusion usually the first number in a
> > series is used. In this case that would be NWA 1068 not NWA 1110.
> >
> > I feel you are trying to create bad will here. I do not understand why
> you
> > feel the need to compare your material to ours. Last week it was a
> > Ureilite, before that it was a primitive achondrite, now a Martian piece.
> > Let scientists make pairing conclusions. Submit samples and have the work
> > done. I am not questioning the authenticity of your pieces, just you
> > tactics.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> > Adam Hupe
> > The Hupe Collection
> > Team LunarRock
> > IMCA 2185
> > raremeteorites_at_comcast.net
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "stan ." <laser_maniac_at_hotmail.com>
> > To: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
> > Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 7:46 PM
> > Subject: [meteorite-list] [FS - ebay] picritic shergotite endecut
> >
> >
> > >
> > > here is one of my last small pieces untill I get my next batch of rocks
> > back
> > > from cutting:
> > >
> >
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6530722627&rd=1&sspagename=ST
> RK%3AMESE%3AIT&rd=1
> > >
> > > a 1.4g end cut of picritic shergotite paired to nwa 1068/1110/2373 - and
> > not
> > > just an informally paired stone, this one has been microprobed.
> > >
> > >
> > > ______________________________________________
> > > Meteorite-list mailing list
> > > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> > > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > Meteorite-list mailing list
> > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Sat 07 May 2005 10:09:55 AM PDT