[meteorite-list] A statement in regards to NWA 3133

From: Adam Hupe <raremeteorites_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Jun 2 19:45:04 2005
Message-ID: <008401c567cd$2f2779c0$6401a8c0_at_c1720188a>

Hi Stan.

I will not comment on the pairing issue again as long as their is sufficient
scientific data to back it up. Stan, I sense you are trying to create some
kind of an argument instead of a debate here. I talk to Dr. Bunch almost
daily so I do not appreciate your insinuations that I have no respect for
his work.

My problem is with dealers, not unlike yourself, borrowing copyrighted
descriptions and incorporating complete sentences written by us into their
own descriptions. You have mentioned my first and last name in your ebay
descriptions even after I asked you kindly to remove them. Show some
respect for other peoples work instead of starting arguments and you may
receive some as well.

Respectfully,

------------------------------------
Adam Hupe
The Hupe Collection
Team LunarRock
IMCA 2185
raremeteorites_at_comcast.net




stealing parts of our descriptions
----- Original Message -----
From: "stan ." <laser_maniac_at_hotmail.com>
To: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] A statement in regards to NWA 3133


>
> >My last comments. The so-called official descriptions posted by Stan to
> >the
> >List which are now in the archives differ greatly than what is now posted
> >in
> >the bulletin.
>
> For the record I never claimed to have an 'offical' description, so called
> or otherwise. Infact my ebay auctions went to great pains to alert
potential
> bidders to the tentative nature of the classifcation data. The information
I
> was given was a 'working classification' and regardless of any diffrences
> the most important issue I belive is that it apears to remain that 1839
and
> 3133 are infact very likely to be paired.
>
>
> >In any case, I have stated from the beginning that I have no problem with
> >what qualified institutions have to say about pairings.
>
> To set the record straight then, given the statements on NAU's web site I
> guess you have no problem with someone calling 1839 paired to 3133 then,
> correct? I'm sure everyone will be glad to see this is the last we will
see
> on the matter. I'm sure hoping you arent holding out for the congressional
> testimony.
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Thu 02 Jun 2005 07:45:39 PM PDT