[meteorite-list] Tanezrouft 062 and lack of NWA coordinates
From: bernd.pauli_at_paulinet.de <bernd.pauli_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri Sep 24 13:18:24 2004 Message-ID: <DIIE.0000000800002951_at_paulinet.de> Hello All, When I saw Frederic's and Christophe's TAN 062 pics (beautiful pics, by the way), I was instantly reminded of a gorgeous 8.79 gr Tanezrouft slice I purchased in Ensisheim from Jean-Luc Parodi. It does look very much like TAN 062 but will be classified as an LL5, S2, W2 in Met.Bull. #89, 2005. What makes it look so gorgeous is a large 10mm FeNi-troilite inclusion that looks a little bit like Lake Constance (Southern Germany) with a 4 millimeter chondrule sitting right beneath. But the point I was trying to make is this: Total known weight, coordinates and other pertinent details for TAN 062 have been published in Met.Bull. #88 and will be published for my 8.79 gr slice in Met.Bull. #89 - I already have the coordinates from J-L. Parodi so I was able to check, compare and conclude that they are different meteorites, not paired, not possibly paired, and the like ... no ambiguities here! But, like many others, I will continue buying NWA's without proper or sufficient documentation because it is the *meteorite* that is at the center of my interest and not possible or potential pairings. If I was a professional scientist, things would be different - as a hobby meteorite collector, it is a nuisance which does not bother me too much. Apart from the hassle and uproar over the "Howardite Blow Out Sale", I agree with Matt Morgan's and Adam's comments: "Its up to you. Point is, ENJOY this HOBBY folks!!!" "all meteorites are cool." Fall and find data is important but a eucrite or a howardite or any other meteorite is what it is for collectors: something to enjoy, something to marvel at, something to enrich our lives because "you only live life once so there is no time for a rehearsal, do the best you can now." Best, Bernd Received on Fri 24 Sep 2004 01:18:21 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |