[meteorite-list] OT: Pluto planet/planetoid
From: almitt <almitt_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:32:50 2004 Message-ID: <40575C42.F7028087_at_kconline.com> Hi Robert, Bernd, Tom and all, Regardless of efforts trying to redefine Pluto's status, it was a Planet by definition for 60 some years. I have little doubt that it is a KB object. I know that Clyde Tombaugh felt it should remain in a planetary status, grand fathered in. I think it would be respectful to keep it that way but name new found objects as KB's from here on out. Sort of a contradiction but how a lot of people feel. Clyde mentioned to me one time (and it is in his book I think) that because of world war II a percentage of the sky was not surveyed like they had hoped to and even though those areas of sky were away from the planetary plane there could certainly be lurking an undiscovered planet. Initially when the size of Pluto was measured it was thought to be smaller than 4,000 miles or about 6,300 km across. Perhaps Pluto's moon Charon played a part in this. When Charon was discovered some different models were applied and a smaller diameter computed. I believe the measurements of Pluto were done at the Hale Telescope (Mt. Polarmar Observatory) by Gerald Kuiper ironically. --AL Mitterling Received on Tue 16 Mar 2004 02:57:54 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |