[meteorite-list] Former Astronaut Glenn Criticizes Chimp Space Plan
From: MexicoDoug_at_aol.com <MexicoDoug_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:32:46 2004 Message-ID: <77.2391edfe.2d7a1169_at_aol.com> --part1_77.2391edfe.2d7a1169_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi John, Just to add my 2 centavos that I agree with all the substance of your message: let me add a possible tweak on the first statement... Rather than a "double standard," ever consider it might be more of a "twin stage addiction" of a sort. Some (or many) members can't do without their meteoritic hits. So when it is quiet, a "You've Got Mail" "meteorite-list" message from a meteorite person in the mailbox is enough to elicit the desired result no matter what the message says, and thus by association: meteorite! But the flip side is once the particular hit dosage becomes physiologically homeostatic, the the other Freudian functions of sometimes diverse list members kick in. Similar problems with side effects (diarrhea and vomiting, for example) to the problems pharma companies have in designing a one-dose-fits all product. (This present message couldn't be harder on bandwidth than the other bah-ha-uh-muah-caca, could it?) Saludos Doug En un mensaje con fecha 03/05/2004 10:11:38 AM Mexico Standard Time, jkg_at_theriver.com escribe: > It seems that this list suffers from a double standard from time to > time. Personally, I think that issues pertaining to the USA space program > deserve more bandwidth and attention on this list than threads like > "uhuhuhuhuh" and the like. If you want to enforce the letter of Art's > laws, most of Ron Baalke's posts shouldn't appear here, after all, what do > Mars probes have to do with meteorites? Don't get me wrong, I enjoy > Baalke's posts and hope they continue to appear on this forum. > As caustic as Randy can be at times I think he makes a good point on this > issue. I'd much rather toss his subject around for a few days instead of > watching Round 75 of the meteorite ego wars or read one more theory about > the evolution of a nonsensical word. > --part1_77.2391edfe.2d7a1169_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <HTML><FONT FACE=3Darial,helvetica><HTML><FONT SIZE=3D2 PTSIZE=3D10 FAMILY= =3D"SANSSERIF" FACE=3D"Arial" LANG=3D"0">Hi John,<BR> <BR> Just to add my 2 centavos that I agree with all the substance of your messag= e: let me add a possible tweak on the first statement... <BR> <BR> Rather than a "double standard," ever consider it might be more of a "twin s= tage addiction" of a sort. Some (or many) members can't do without the= ir meteoritic hits. So when it is quiet, a "You've Got Mail" "meteorit= e-list" message from a meteorite person in the mailbox is enough to elicit t= he desired result no matter what the message says, and thus by association:=20= meteorite! But the flip side is once the particular hit dosage becomes= physiologically homeostatic, the the other Freudian functions of sometimes=20= diverse list members kick in. Similar problems with side effects (diar= rhea and vomiting, for example) to the problems pharma companies have in des= igning a one-dose-fits all product. (This present message couldn't be=20= harder on bandwidth than the other bah-ha-uh-muah-caca, could it?)<BR> <BR> Saludos<BR> Doug<BR> <BR> En un mensaje con fecha 03/05/2004 10:11:38 AM Mexico Standard Time, jkg_at_the= river.com escribe:<BR> <BR> <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=3DCITE style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT= : 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">It seems that this list suffers= from a double standard from time to <BR> time. Personally, I think that issues pertaining to the USA space prog= ram <BR> deserve more bandwidth and attention on this list than threads like <BR> "uhuhuhuhuh" and the like. If you want to enforce the letter of Art's=20= <BR> laws, most of Ron Baalke's posts shouldn't appear here, after all, what do <= BR> Mars probes have to do with meteorites? Don't get me wrong, I enjoy <BR> Baalke's posts and hope they continue to appear on this forum.<BR> As caustic as Randy can be at times I think he makes a good point on this <B= R> issue. I'd much rather toss his subject around for a few days instead=20= of <BR> watching Round 75 of the meteorite ego wars or read one more theory about <B= R> the evolution of a nonsensical word.<BR> </BLOCKQUOTE><BR> <BR> </FONT></HTML> --part1_77.2391edfe.2d7a1169_boundary-- Received on Fri 05 Mar 2004 12:22:49 PM PST |
 StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit Yahoo MyWeb
|