[meteorite-list] fireball speed
From: Sterling K. Webb <kelly_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:31:25 2004 Message-ID: <40395BCB.64F21E32_at_bhil.com> Whoops! It's those tricky decimal points again. Or long division, perhaps. Either that, or the back of this envelope is not big enough. Maybe I should have used one of those two PDP-11's you have connected with a serial cable? And the really silly thing is that three years ago (02-20-01), I posted the correct answer to this List myself. The best thing about keeping 30,000 emails in your computer is the fun of finding one. At the risk of repeating myself, here it is: Then there's the question of how large a stone could possibly fall and survive? Nothing can get through the atmosphere to the ground without impacting at destructively high speeds unless its mass per unit area is less than the atmosphere's mass per unit area (from the top of the atmosphere down to the ground). Assuming a stone three times denser than water, the theoretical upper limit is a sphere of about three meters diameter, or 40,000,000 grams (40 metric tons). To reach this upper limit, everything would have to be perfect. The stone would have to be strong, no cracks or fissures, well consolidated (porosity of 1% or less), so it is strong enough not to fracture under the dynamic pressure of re-entry. It would probably be an achondrite. It should be of a regular shape so turbulence wouldn't make it oscillate and saw it apart. It should have the lowest possible entry velocity and a low angle of incidence for a long grazing re-entry, so it will reach its stagnation point at a very low altitude, near the ground, so it doesn't pick up much speed in the dead drop phase of its fall. It shouldn't land on rocks, which would fragment it, but soft soils. Is that all? What else do you want? That's all. That's the perfect meteorite. So if anyone notices a ten-foot ball of rock half-buried in the cow pasture and covered with fresh black fusion crust, they should definitely phone it in. Richard Norton estimated that, even in the best case, a meteroid on it way to being a meteorite loses 90% of its mass to ablation on the way down, so maybe the 4 ton Jilin started out high in the atmosphere as the "perfect" 40 ton chondrite. Here's some comparisons: Mechanical (crushing) strength: Carbonaceous chondrites from 0.1 bar to 10 bar. Ordinary Chondrites from 62 bar to 3700 bar. Achondrites from 2500 bar to 4000 bar. And irons from 3200 bar to 4400 bar. Dynamic pressure of the atmosphere = density of air times velocity of meteorite squared. Fireballs in meteor showers break up at 0.1 bars to 10 bars. Sporadic bolides at 30 to 50 bars. Tracked and recovered stones (like Lost City and Innisfree) never reached 200 bars of dynamic pressure. The Tunguska object (whatever it was) disrupted at 200 bars. Cratering will occur when the object impacts at a speed greater than the speed of sound in the material of the impactor. You would think the speed of sound might have been measured in many meteorites, but it hasn't. The only values I could find are: for shear waves 600 to 1200 meters/sec and for transverse or pressure waves, 2000 to 4200 meters/sec. This is considerably less than for terrestial rocks. Meteorites are much more porous than terrestial rocks also. Ordinary chondrites have porosities of 0.7% to 18.3%. Carbonaceous porosities up to 25% (like a sponge). Even achondrites run 4.3% to 15.1%. Similar terrestial rocks would probably not exceed 1% porosity. Meteorites are poorly consolidated. More than you ever wanted to know, I guess. At least epoxy dries faster than paint. And, you got the answer right before it dried! I bet you used one of those PDP-11's. Sterling ---------------------------------------------------------- "stan ." wrote: > > By the way, the maximum weight for a stone to reach the > > ground is less than for an iron, only 40 tons or so. That's a > > stone roughly spheroidal and about 25 feet in diameter! So, if > > you notice a fusion crusted rock, say, 9 meters across, be > > sure and check it with a magnet. > > thats a bit overly optimistic with regards to diameter I'm afraid... a > shperiod with a radius of 9 meters would have 382 million cubic centimeters > of volume. at the low end of 3 g/cc (juvinas) that would be about 1145 > metric tons. 25 feet in diameter is still 402 metric tons.. to get 40 tons, > assuming a light eucrite, you would need a rock of about 147cm in radius, or > 11.6ft across.... so remember, if you are walking down a path and spot what > looks like a eucrite boulder, dont bother checking it unless it's less than > 12ft in diameter! ;) now if only lunars came in that size! > > yes I'm bored and on the 'net... unfortunatly uv cure epoxy doesnt cure any > faster when you watch it, hence mental math and posting = a good way to pass > the time :) > > _________________________________________________________________ > Stay informed on Election 2004 and the race to Super Tuesday. > http://special.msn.com/msn/election2004.armx > > ______________________________________________ > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com > http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list Received on Sun 22 Feb 2004 08:47:58 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |