[meteorite-list] Re:Meteorite question

From: Steve Witt <stelor96_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:25:43 2004
Message-ID: <20030523080716.7290.qmail_at_web9601.mail.yahoo.com>

Ryan,

You're absolutely correct! In my opinion.

Steve


--- Yellowengine_at_aol.com wrote:
> I would think that the term "strewn field" would only be implied
> when multiple specimens of the same fall are located within a
> defined area, which is designated as the strewn field of that
> particular fall. Single stones which are analytically verified to
> be from separate falls (e.g. a DAG or an NWA) found within a the
> same vicinity would not represent a strewn field unless additional
> specimens of one, or both of them was discovered. In that case it
> would represent two separate strewn fields that just so happen to
> overlap each other. Just my opinion.
>
> -Ryan
>
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


=====
Steve Witt
IMCA #9020

http://www.meteoritecollectors.org

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com
Received on Fri 23 May 2003 04:07:16 AM PDT