[meteorite-list] Re: Question & Contest Details

From: Robert Verish <bolidechaser_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:25:42 2004
Message-ID: <20030520214604.31664.qmail_at_web80501.mail.yahoo.com>

Hey Frank,

That would be my guess, as well.
But think about it. This specimen must be one GREAT
meteor-wrong! ;-)
Sure would like to see an image of this "bad boy".

But this raises another question regarding the current
"contest". Larry supplied a detailed disclaimer
should any of his meteor-wrongs end up being properly
identified as a meteorite. But what if the opposite
should happen? What if one of his "meteorites"
becomes a meteor-wrong?!

:-)
Regards,
Bob V.

----------------- Original Message -----------------
[meteorite-list] Question
fcressy fcressy_at_prodigy.net
Tue, 20 May 2003 12:54:14 -0700


Hi Steven,
I'm guessing it was given a collection number in the
Antarctic and later found to be terrestrial. They had
to account for the number in the catalog.
Just my best guess,
Frank

----- Original Message -----
From: S. Singletary <jumper_at_MIT.EDU>
To: Meteorite Mailing List
<meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 12:17 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Question






__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com
Received on Tue 20 May 2003 05:46:03 PM PDT