[meteorite-list] Barringer Meteor $$$$
From: Tom aka James Knudson <knudson911_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:25:37 2004 Message-ID: <00d501c315ea$0c0b3ee0$cfc543d8_at_malcolm> Hello List, I have a question. If a new meteorite hit tomorrow and made a new crater on federal land, could someone stake a claim and end up with the new crater? Thanks, Tom The proudest member of the IMCA 6168 ----- Original Message ----- From: Steve Schoner <steve_schoner_at_yahoo.com> To: <MeteorHntr_at_aol.com>; <thebigcollector@msn.com>; <knudson911_at_frontiernet.net>; <mlblood@cox.net>; <StarHarvest@aol.com>; <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2003 4:15 PM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Barringer Meteor $$$$ > --- MeteorHntr_at_aol.com wrote: > > Hello steve_schoner_at_yahoo.com, > > > > In reference to your comment: > > > > è "Why is this crater not owned by the Government > > and > > è preserved under the National Park Service? > > > > Why? Maybe because they pay a lot of sales, > > property and income taxes to > > their county and state governments. > > > > I would never accuse any one of paying officials > > under the table, yet it is > > funny how alleged meteorite poachers are treated up > > there when caught. I > > call them "alleged meteorite poachers" since I don't > > think anyone has EVER > > been convicted of hunting or removing meteorites > > from the Crater area. > > Charges are made, but they always seem to get > > mysteriously dropped before the > > cases get to court. As Schoner would say "Humm...." > > > > Oh, I think the Barringer's pay off (excuse me, I > > meant to day "donate" to) > > the Meteoritical Society a couple of thousand > > dollars a year don't they? > > > > You know, my guess is that the real reason that the > > crater makes, what over > > 1,000,000 visitors a year times $14 each minus their > > huge (couple hundred > > thousand dollar) overhead expenses plus gift shop > > revenues is because there > > hasn't been a big enough stink made to the right > > government officials. > > > > It seems that Schoner in the past has done a bit of > > effort, but maybe the > > people who read his letters just don't care enough > > to do something about it. > > And if they are complaining to local politicians who > > might have personal > > agendas to do favors for the Barringers, then those > > are not the politicians > > one should be talking to. Maybe contacting a > > non-incumbant person running > > for that particular congress seat BEFORE they get > > elected might be worth > > while. > > > > Maybe those of us on the list that feel passionate > > about this could all right > > our respective congressmen and women. If there was > > actually a little bit of > > money that could be raised, a well placed billboard > > in the region (like on > > that long road up to the Crater) might be cost > > efficient. Maybe with a > > website "www.FreeTheCrater.com" printed on it. > > > > Not that Geoff Notkin would want to do anything in > > the way of a "write your > > congressman" campaign (I would never want to commit > > him to such a project > > without him volunteering himself) but if he did, > > there is no one in the world > > that I have ever met that has been able to do 1/10 > > of what he has been able > > to do in the past when it comes to getting the > > written complaint letters to > > the right people to get amazing things changed. > > > > Anyway, just my 2 grams of shale oxides worth... > > > > Steve > > > > Steve, > > Everything you have said is right on the money (pun > intended). > > Something needs to be done, and it's time that > Congress re-examines the 1872 Mining Act, possibly > eliminating it altogether or at least amending it to > give the "people" of this so called "land of the free" > the right to determine whether a site warrants > protection beyond what the 1872 Mining Act provides. > (Which is no protection at all) > > That Meteor Crater is a Natural Treasure, there can be > no doubt. > > It was instrumental in bringing to the attention of > scientists world wide that asteroids do strike the > earth. And in subsequent research it provided insight > into the actual processes involved. Dr. Shoemaker > earned his PhD in studying the crater before his later > work at USGS. Then USGS sent teams of astronaughts > out there to study the crater so that they would have > a better understanding of what they would see on the > moon. > > The crater has a history, both in the Old West and the > New, and it is of utmost scientific importance in that > it is the most recent crater of size on the earth. > > All this said, what is being done with it? > > Talk about preservation? > > Bar T Bar had the audacity to create a "secondary" > crater a short distance away from the south side of > the real crater to water cows. > > The Park Service or any other overseeing government > agency would never allow that. As it is now it > compromises the stratigraphy of the crater, and also > ruins its visual appeal. Also, with regards to > scientific research, government controls are by far > better that the rigor maroe that Bar-T-Bar-Meteor > Crater Enterprises put me through. Ten years of red > tape, demands that I approach institutions, and > individuals of renown to gain their support, all with > the intention that I would give up and go away. But > all the while... "poachers" whoever they are, go out > and pick specimens up and sell them "under the table." > The government would never allow these abuses to go on > if they had not given the "mining rights" away. > > And the court cases that they inflict on the > "poachers" that they have arrested... You are right > on! Not one of these has ever made it to court. It > legal harassment. They have done it time and time > again, but do not take even one case all the way. > Just the threat is enough, and legal costs to keep > un-authorized persons at bay, and keep them from > "mining" meteorites from public lands surrounding the > crater. > > There is nothing to be mined there. There is no load > of meteorites in the crater or outside of it. Just > individual fragments and vapor products scattered far > and wide across the desert. And in the history of the > crater, Dr. Nininger proved it when he found metallic > sphereoids confirming that Dr. Moulton's previous > prediction that the meteorite was vaporized on impact. > Dr. Shoemaker in his PhD. thesis elaborated on the > processes of crater formation expanding the process to > all major cratering events, showing exactly how the > process unfolded to produce what is seen in impact > craters > > Meteor Crater is an archetype for all cratering events > world wide. The popular, and scientific history of > the site is secure, and it is certainly more than just > a hole in the ground. > > It is not a "mine" for meteorite "resources," and > never will be. > > It is a historic, scientific National Treasure, as it > should be; rather than a site to mine people's > pockets, as it now is. > > $10 to $20 per/person ? > > See any National Park for much less, and get a great > amount of correct interpretation of the site as well. > > > Steve Schoner > http://www.geocities.com/meteorite_identification > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. > http://search.yahoo.com > Received on Fri 09 May 2003 01:15:43 AM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |