[meteorite-list] Semarkona - type specimen? (Clarification)
From: pkmorgan_at_rmci.net <pkmorgan_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:25:37 2004 Message-ID: <65451.156.153.254.10.1052410681.squirrel_at_webmail.velocitus.net> I would like to clarify that I was in no way questioning the integrity of Michael or how the specimen was represented. I believe at least one NWA (505 I think) had been recently "reclassified" and was wondering if the .0 classification stuck to this one. Phil > > Dr. Grossman recently stated that "Semarkona is significantly less > metamorphosed (than Bishunpur), and is still the reigning champ in this > department." > > If I recall correctly, Michael Blood was listing "the new type specimen > for LL3.0" in his auction this last February. Is/was it? And, just out > of curiosity, what NWA number was finally assigned to it? > > Thanks and Regards to all, > Phil > > > > ______________________________________________ > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com > http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list Received on Thu 08 May 2003 12:18:01 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |