[meteorite-list] New Find
From: Mark Jackson <b0rtz2003_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:25:34 2004 Message-ID: <20030502220406.61953.qmail_at_web41705.mail.yahoo.com> --0-1832119428-1051913046=:61178 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Seems like you have a rather non-proactive/productive approach Steve. That's no problem with me; you are welcome to it. It really sounds pretty boring actually . . . hummm . . . nope . . . I have too much work to do. Steve Schoner <steve_schoner_at_yahoo.com> wrote: --- Paul Heinrich wrote: > Re: [meteorite-list] New Find > > > > >> On Wed, 30 Apr 2003 10:11:28 -0700 (PDT) > >> Steve Schoner wrote: > > ...text deleted ... > > >humm... > > > >humm... > > > >humm... > > > >and another humm... > > > >Wait and see yes, till then skeptical. > > > >Steve Schoner > > Given that the number of "craterwrongs" are > only outnumber by the number of meteorwrongs, > it is a very good position for a person > has to very, very skeptical of any claims > by anybody that have a meteor crater. > > Yours, > > Paul > Baton Rouge, LA I will say this, about that... Unless an astrogeologist of certified renoun proclaims the find as an impact crater, I will remain skeptical. I think most, if not all here on this list will take the same position. humm... (we wait) Steve Schoner http://www.geocities.com/meteorite_identification http://www.geocities.com/american_meteorite_survey __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. --0-1832119428-1051913046=:61178 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii <DIV>Seems like you have a rather non-proactive/productive approach Steve. That's no problem with me; you are welcome to it. It really sounds pretty boring actually . . . hummm . . . </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>nope . . . I have too much work to do.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><BR><BR><B><I>Steve Schoner <steve_schoner_at_yahoo.com></I></B> wrote:</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid"><BR>--- Paul Heinrich <LENTICULINA1_at_YAHOO.COM>wrote:<BR>> Re: [meteorite-list] New Find <BR>> <BR>> ><BR>> >> On Wed, 30 Apr 2003 10:11:28 -0700 (PDT) <BR>> >> Steve Schoner wrote:<BR>> <BR>> ...text deleted ...<BR>> <BR>> >humm...<BR>> ><BR>> >humm...<BR>> ><BR>> >humm...<BR>> ><BR>> >and another humm...<BR>> ><BR>> >Wait and see yes, till then skeptical.<BR>> ><BR>> >Steve Schoner<BR>> <BR>> Given that the number of "craterwrongs" are<BR>> only outnumber by the number of meteorwrongs,<BR>> it is a very good position for a person <BR>> has to very, very skeptical of any claims<BR>> by anybody that have a meteor crater. <BR>> <BR>> Yours,<BR>> <BR>> Paul<BR>> Baton Rouge, LA<BR><BR><BR>I will say this,<BR><BR>about that...<BR><BR>Unless an astrogeologist of certified renoun proclaims<BR >the find as an impact crater, I will remain skeptical.<BR><BR>I think most, if not all here on this list will take<BR>the same position.<BR><BR>humm...<BR><BR>(we wait)<BR><BR>Steve Schoner<BR>http://www.geocities.com/meteorite_identification<BR>http://www.geocities.com/american_meteorite_survey<BR><BR>__________________________________<BR>Do you Yahoo!?<BR>The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.<BR>http://search.yahoo.com<BR><BR>______________________________________________<BR>Meteorite-list mailing list<BR>Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com<BR>http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list</BLOCKQUOTE><p><hr SIZE=1> Do you Yahoo!?<br> <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/search/mailsig/*http://search.yahoo.com">The New Yahoo! Search</a> - Faster. Easier. Bingo. --0-1832119428-1051913046=:61178-- Received on Fri 02 May 2003 06:04:06 PM PDT |
 StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit Yahoo MyWeb
|