[meteorite-list] DOD Satellites Detect March 2003 Bolide Over Park Forest
From: Adam Hupe <adamhupe_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:21:01 2004 Message-ID: <01b101c345c8$915442a0$b4dbe60c_at_attbi.com> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_01AE_01C3458D.E41CBDE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear List Members, It looks like some are starting to realize the secret of the Park Forest = strewnfield, it is reversed. I think this has happened only a couple = times in history. I hinted at this in a June 15th post to the list not = wanting to take the element of surprise away from a person who is = authoring a paper on this very subject. All the best, Adam ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Thetoprok_at_aol.com=20 To: meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com=20 Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 8:01 PM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] DOD Satellites Detect March 2003 Bolide = Over Park Forest Hello Folks, This whole thing has me a bit perplexed for several reasons. First, = the stone my brother and I recovered had a distinct angle of entry that = I saw and documented, and passed on to Mr. Sipiera. That trajectory = definately indicated that the offending stone came in from the S.E. and = was heading in a N.W. direction. I determined this before ever being = subjected to other theoriesof direction of entry. I also spoke with = eyewitnesses in the days that followed and all backed up that = conclusion. On a second trip I met with a man named Atul Kumar, He isn't a = scientist but he has been gathering info on the strewn field for the = astronomy club that he is involved with. He has compiled quite a = list/map of stones that were recovered, including weights and locations = of recovery, and his map indicates the same S.E. to N.W. direction, with = the larger stones coming from the N.W. end of the strewn field.=20 Of course I can't argue with the DOD satellite observation, but it = sure is contradictory to what I've been thinking all along! The = satellite indicates an entry of exactly the opposite of what the strewn = field maps look like that I have seen, and my own recoveries, 70 gram = stone in Steger, 638gram stone in P.F. indicate at the very least a = South to North trajectory, (roughly). No matter how you slice it, based on the DOD satellite info, the = larger stones should be south of the small ones, and this is just not = the case. Is human error possible, between interpretation of the satellite data = and publication of said information? Curious minds want to know, Larry=20 ------=_NextPart_000_01AE_01C3458D.E41CBDE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" = http-equiv=3DContent-Type> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2919.6307" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Dear List Members,</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>It looks like some are starting to = realize the=20 secret of the Park Forest strewnfield, it is reversed. I think = this has=20 happened only a couple times in history. I hinted at this in a = June 15th=20 post to the list not wanting to take the element of surprise away from a = person=20 who is authoring a paper on this very subject.</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>All the best,</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Adam</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE=20 style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: = 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: = black"><B>From:</B>=20 <A href=3D"mailto:Thetoprok_at_aol.com"=20 title=3DThetoprok_at_aol.com>Thetoprok@aol.com</A> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20 href=3D"mailto:meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com"=20 = title=3Dmeteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>meteorite-list@meteoritecentr= al.com</A>=20 </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, July 08, 2003 = 8:01=20 PM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [meteorite-list] = DOD=20 Satellites Detect March 2003 Bolide Over Park Forest</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face=3Darial,helvetica><FONT face=3DArial = lang=3D0 size=3D2=20 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF"><BR><BR>Hello Folks,<BR><BR>This whole thing has = me a bit=20 perplexed for several reasons. First, the stone my brother and I = recovered had=20 a distinct angle of entry that I saw and documented, and passed on to = Mr.=20 Sipiera. That trajectory definately indicated that the offending stone = came in=20 from the S.E. and was heading in a N.W. direction. I determined this = before=20 ever being subjected to other theoriesof direction of entry. I also = spoke with=20 eyewitnesses in the days that followed and all backed up that=20 conclusion.<BR>On a second trip I met with a man named Atul Kumar, He = isn't a=20 scientist but he has been gathering info on the strewn field for the = astronomy=20 club that he is involved with. He has compiled quite a list/map of = stones that=20 were recovered, including weights and locations of recovery, and his = map=20 indicates the same S.E. to N.W. direction, with the larger stones = coming from=20 the N.W. end of the strewn field. <BR>Of course I can't argue with the = DOD=20 satellite observation, but it sure is contradictory to what I've been = thinking=20 all along! The satellite indicates an entry of exactly the opposite of = what=20 the strewn field maps look like that I have seen, and my own = recoveries, 70=20 gram stone in Steger, 638gram stone in P.F. indicate at the very least = a South=20 to North trajectory, (roughly).<BR>No matter how you slice it, based = on the=20 DOD satellite info, the larger stones should be south of the small = ones, and=20 this is just not the case.<BR>Is human error possible, between = interpretation=20 of the satellite data and publication of said information?<BR>Curious = minds=20 want to know,<BR>Larry</FONT> </FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_01AE_01C3458D.E41CBDE0-- Received on Tue 08 Jul 2003 11:17:01 PM PDT |
 StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit Yahoo MyWeb
|