[meteorite-list] lunar?
From: DiamondMeteor <DiamondMeteor_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 09:55:46 2004 Message-ID: <OE22AjAncfMSst5HtDM000135c8_at_hotmail.com> Dear Dave and List; Sorry if my posts are irritating you so much; but I dont see why!!! I promise I will not post anything about my METEORITES until I get them certified. The white regions in the last pictures are NOT calcite at all. Besides, there is a clear fusion crust that maybe not seen well in the picture because the bulk is also black. I forgot to tell you that the rock is a little magnetic, though this is not common for lunar meteorites. The REAL expert that I am talking about is someone who had tested many of the known lunar meteorites and rocks before, including those brought back by Apollo. Remember that I am searching in Oman where quite a few lunar meteorites had been found before. You will see soon that all these three types of rocks are lunar. Including the last one that would be the first of its kind. http://pages.britishlibrary.net/mhy10/meteor/ln1.htm http://pages.britishlibrary.net/mhy10/meteor/ln2.htm http://pages.britishlibrary.net/mhy10/meteor/ln3.htm Good Byeee Mohamed --------------------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Harris" <entropydave_at_ic24.net> To: <DiamondMeteor_at_hotmail.com>; "metlist" <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com> Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 10:52 PM Subject: [meteorite-list] lunar? > Subject: [meteorite-list] dare you say this is not LUNAR > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C19C7C.C779A380 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="windows-1256" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Please look at the pictures of this nice brecciated lunar meteorite with = > fusion crust that I found today: > http://pages.britishlibrary.net/mhy10/meteor/ln1.htm > Also, the pictures that I showed you a while ago, turned out to be lunar = > as well (Mare Basalt), as one of the REAL experts in the field agreed. = > Testing is undergoing now. You can compare the pictures below to = > Asuka-881757 and Dhofar587: > http://pages.britishlibrary.net/mhy10/meteor/ln2.htm > > In a way you helped me alot by refusing whatever I post; this gave me = > more enthusiasm to look for undefeatable proofs. > > Regards.... > Mohamed > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= > Mohamed, > Which expert? Mohamed, you seem hell bent in refusing any advice - I suggest > that in future you direct all your queries and rocks to this lunar meteorite > expert and leave us all alone. I have to say that I am getting irritated > now by your persistance - and I do not get irritated easily. > Please remember that some of the listees are professional meteoriticists and > planetary geologists and are world leaders in their field - you are neither. > > I will not be responding any further to your emails as I feel I may start to > state things that I will surely regret at a later date, even if true! > > Regs > dave > > > -- > In gentle decay, > dave > > http://www.meteorites.ic24.net/index.html > > http://www.thc.u-net.com/davethc1.htm > > > "I have a proof that x^n+y^n=z^n never has integer solutions for n>2. > However, it won't fit into my signature file...." > > > > > > > ______________________________________________ > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com > http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > Received on Sun 13 Jan 2002 03:13:48 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |