[meteorite-list] Zagora "CR2" & "NWA 801"
From: Randy Mils <acculabs_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 09:54:10 2004 Message-ID: <F128rRjbDt3HvoFOAmE00019c4a_at_hotmail.com> <html><div style='background-color:'><DIV> <P>So, based on your argument, everytime Dave Andrews searches the Holbrook strewnfield and finds an obvious Holbrook, that diminishes the value of all other "legitimate" Holbrooks. Should this flawed argument hold true for every other strewnfield on earth.?</P> <P>NWA 801 is just as valid a name as Holbrook, Canyon Diablo, Sikhote-alin, Imilac, Gao, Glorietta or any other meteorite that comes from a strewnfield. Any future finds that are obvious pairings should be called exactly what they are. Doesn't matter if it is a named or numbered strewnfield the logic is the same.</P> <P>Randy<BR></P></DIV> <DIV></DIV> <DIV></DIV>>From: Robert Verish <BOLIDECHASER_at_YAHOO.COM> <DIV></DIV>>To: Meteorite-list Meteoritecentral <METEORITE-LIST_at_METEORITECENTRAL.COM> <DIV></DIV>>Subject: [meteorite-list] Zagora "CR2" & "NWA 801" <DIV></DIV>>Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 19:48:16 -0800 (PST) <DIV></DIV> <DIV></DIV> <DIV></DIV>> <DIV></DIV>>But then, you find all your competitors calling their <DIV></DIV>>stones "NWA 801"! They are essentially reaping the <DIV></DIV>>benefits of your efforts. Or worse, the dilution <DIV></DIV>>caused by all their various "NWA 801" stones may <DIV></DIV>>negate the value of your genuine, classified mass. I <DIV></DIV>>would think this would be a concern of yours, as well. <DIV></DIV>> <DIV></DIV> <DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. <a href='http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag4_etl_EN.asp'>Click Here</a><br></html> Received on Tue 26 Feb 2002 06:53:51 AM PST |
 StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit Yahoo MyWeb
|