[meteorite-list] update on kilabo/hadeja

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

From: Eric Twelker <twelker_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 09:53:36 2004
Message-ID: <BA2A1AB3.F6A3%twelker_at_alaska.net>

> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

--MS_Mac_OE_3123321524_1260858_MIME_Part
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

Hello All

 For those of you that have purchased Kilabo/Hadejia from me--as it says
on the cards I enclosed with the meteorites--I will be sending out new cards
and labels when the NomCom information is in. If Kilabo is the name
accepted by NomCom, then this is what the cards and labels will say.

 Regards,

 Eric Twelker
 twelker_at_alaska.net
 http://www.meteoritemarket.com

From: Roman Jirasek <rom_at_look.ca>
Reply-To: Roman Jirasek <rom_at_look.ca>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 17:02:27 -0500
To: meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] update on kilabo/hadeja

You are correct Mike. I am still waiting to see the official info
for the proposed name Bensour, before I manufacture
a new aluminum label for collectors. As of November 6th
Jeff Grossman wrote that the NomCom has not discussed
it yet. It's not the classification that is in question, it's
the exact fall date and TKW that have some discrepancies.

We must all be patient on these matters.

Roman Jirasek
www.meteoritelabels.com <http://www.meteoritelabels.com>

----- Original Message -----
From: tett <mailto:tett_at_rogers.com>
To: STEVE ARNOLD <mailto:catmountainman_at_yahoo.com> ;
meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2002 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] update on kilabo/hadeja

Correct me if I'm wrong but, doesn't one have to wait until the
classification is published by the Nomenclature Committee of the
Meteoritical Society before anyone can say for sure what the official name
is?

Mike Tettenborn
Owen Sound, Ontario
----- Original Message -----
From: STEVE ARNOLD <mailto:catmountainman_at_yahoo.com>
To: meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2002 1:07 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] update on kilabo/hadeja

I have been in contact with my source, and I found out that these (2)
meteorites are the same. They fell in different areas, but it fell closer to
hadeja, thus the name. Around 8 to 12 kilos were found. I also learned as of
this thanksgiving, that this meteorite was officially classified here in
chicago, and it will be classified under the name, K I L A B O, not hadeja.
So it hurts me when I get private emails saying that I do not know what I am
saying. Ijust needed to dig a little deeper. But it was classified as
KILABO, not hadeja. Sorry for the uproar. Soon this piece will be hard to
get as well as hard to find. More will be learned in tucson. This piece will
be in the meteorological guide as kilabo.

 thank you, steve arnold, chicago

--MS_Mac_OE_3123321524_1260858_MIME_Part
Content-type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [meteorite-list] update on kilabo/hadeja</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
Hello All 
 
   For those of you that have purchased Kilabo/Hadejia from=
me--as it says on the cards I enclosed with the meteorites--I will be sendi=
ng out new cards and labels when the NomCom information is in.  If Kila=
bo is the name accepted by NomCom, then this is what the cards and labels wi=
ll say.   
<BLOCKQUOTE> 
</BLOCKQUOTE>    Regards, 
 
   Eric Twelker 
   twelker_at_alaska.net 
   http://www.meteoritemarket.com 
 
<BLOCKQUOTE>From: Roman Jirasek <rom_at_look.ca> 
Reply-To: Roman Jirasek <rom_at_look.ca> 
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 17:02:27 -0500 
To: meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com 
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] update on kilabo/hadeja 
 
</BLOCKQUOTE> 
<BLOCKQUOTE>You are correct Mike. I am still waiting to see =
the official info 
for the proposed name Bensour, before I manufacture 
a new aluminum label for collectors. As of November 6th 
Jeff Grossman wrote that the NomCom has not discussed 
it yet. It's not the classification that is in question, it's 
the exact fall date and TKW that have some discrepancies. 
 
We must all be patient on these matters. 
 
Roman Jirasek 
www.meteoritelabels.com <http://www.meteoritelabels.com> 
 
 
----- Original Message ----- 
<BLOCKQUOTE>From: tett <mailto:tett_at_rogers.com>   
To: STEVE ARNOLD <mailto:catmountainman_at_yahoo.com>  ; met=
eorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com 
Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2002 4:44 PM 
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] update on kilabo/hadeja 
 
Correct me if I'm wrong but, doesn't one =
have to wait until the classification is published by the Nomenclature Commi=
ttee of the Meteoritical Society before anyone can say for sure what the off=
icial name is?   
 
Mike Tettenborn 
Owen Sound, Ontario 
<BLOCKQUOTE>----- Original Message ----- 
From: STEVE ARNOLD <mailto:catmountainman_at_yahoo.com>  <BR=
>
To: meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com 
Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2002 1:07 PM 
Subject: [meteorite-list] update on kilabo/hadeja 
 
 
I have been in contact with my source, and I found out that these (2) meteo=
rites are the same. They fell in different areas, but it fell closer to hade=
ja, thus the name. Around 8 to 12 kilos were found. I also learned as of thi=
s thanksgiving, that this meteorite was officially classified here in chicag=
o, and it will be classified under the name, K I L A B O, not hadeja. So it =
hurts me when I get private emails saying that I do not know what I am sayin=
g. Ijust needed to dig a little deeper. But it was classified as KILABO, not=
hadeja. Sorry for the uproar. Soon this piece will be hard to get as well a=
s hard to find. More will be learned in tucson. This piece will be in the me=
teorological guide as kilabo. 
 
            &n=
bsp;            =
            &nbs=
p; thank you, steve arnold, chicago 
</BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE> 
</BLOCKQUOTE> 
</BODY>
</HTML>

--MS_Mac_OE_3123321524_1260858_MIME_Part--
Received on Sat 21 Dec 2002 05:18:43 PM PST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Mikestockj_at_aol.com: "[meteorite-list] Re: Ad..book sale"
Previous message: Roman: "[meteorite-list] update on kilabo/hadeja"
In reply to: Roman: "[meteorite-list] update on kilabo/hadeja"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

StumbleUpon

del.icio.us

Yahoo MyWeb