[meteorite-list] Tektites: lunar/terrestrial
From: Matson, Robert <ROBERT.D.MATSON_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 09:43:30 2004 Message-ID: <AF564D2B9D91D411B9FE00508BF1C8698E550F_at_US-Torrance.mail.saic.com> Hi Karl (aka Joseph) and List, > my view on this intriguing subject is that most tektites are lunar > the reason is that if they are terrestrial what is the parent rock(s)??? At first blush, it would appear that you are implying that if tektites don't have a terrestrial origin, then the moon is the only other option. But what if someone is able to rule out the moon based on some evidence -- where does that leave you? I am not a tektite expert, but I ~am~ a celestial mechanics expert, and in my opinion there is no dynamical mechanism by which lunar material can be launched toward earth (either by lunar volcanism, lunar impact, or a combination of the two) and not reenter more or less randomly over the entire surface of the earth. The earth only subtends about 1.8 degrees as seen from the moon. Angular dispersion following impact (or eruption) from the lunar surface would thus cause lunar tektites to be captured by earth at all latitudes and longitudes over a period of perhaps thousands of years. But do we find tektites all over the earth? No. They are found in fairly specific regions. This, in my opinion, is a fatal flaw with the lunar-source hypothesis. Cheers, Rob Received on Mon 09 Jul 2001 11:09:15 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |