[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Ghubara - H or L?

To: Matt Morgan <mhmeteorites@geocities.com>
Subject: Ghubara - H or L?
From: Bernd Pauli HD <bernd.pauli@lehrer1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 1999 14:20:49 +0200
CC: John Sinclair <skystone@worldnet.att.net>, meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Old-X-Envelope-To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
References: <000801bf0f84$d1adef00$f2530a3f@oemcomputer> <37FA8394.196E1F5C@geocities.com>
Resent-Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 08:23:07 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-From: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Resent-Message-ID: <uHDxrD.A.lzB.k7z-3@mu.pair.com>
Resent-Sender: meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com

Matt Morgan schrieb:

> Yes a xenolithic L5. - Matt

and ...


BENOIT P.H. et al. (1998) The Ghubara L5 breccia and its regolith
maturity (Meteoritics 33-4, 1998, A014):

The meteorite is gas-rich, and it is clear that Ghubara is a regolith
breccia with dark matrix and light clasts... We suggest that Ghubara is
a regolith breccia of moderate maturity, comparable to St. Mesmin and
less mature than Leighton.


Best wishes,

Bernd

----------
Archives located at:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/list_best.html

For help, FAQ's and sub. info. visit:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing_list.html
----------

Follow-Ups:

Re: Ghubara - H or L?

From: Matt Morgan <mhmeteorites@geocities.com>

References:

Ghubara - H or L?

From: "John Sinclair" <skystone@worldnet.att.net>

Re: Ghubara - H or L?

From: Matt Morgan <mhmeteorites@geocities.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Dust aloft was Re:Meteor May Not Have Destroyed Dinosaurs Afterall?
Next by Date: Re: Bernd: Meteor May Not Have Destroyed Dinosaurs Afterall?
Prev by thread: Re: Ghubara - H or L?
Next by thread: Re: Ghubara - H or L?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread