[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Comment and question
- To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Subject: Comment and question
- From: JJSwaim <terrafirma@ibm.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 1987 11:20:58 -0500
- Old-X-Envelope-To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
- Reply-To: terrafirma@ibm.net
- Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 17:10:12 -0500 (EST)
- Resent-From: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"DUK23D.A.TXC.Zplz0"@mu.pair.com>
- Resent-Sender: meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com
Bravo! Marvelous to see this wonderful, melifluous exchange. I feel
like I'm at Carnegie Hall witnessing various finely trained violins do
what only they can do. Wonder if it's possible to approximate the age of
such violins based on the half-life of an impetuous new isotope of
carbon residing (as I do) in NYC?
Question: (Bear with me, kind sirs, I have not done my homework) Since
we are just learning more about endotropism on our planet, e.g.
discovery of anti-aging enzymes, (named something like telermarace). I
find it difficult to place any qualitative or quantitive restraints on
such a vibrant organism, if you will, as the universe (or what we know
of it). Is it your position that no such enzymal activity can be
applied to materials from 'outer space'? In other words, since we are
a conglomerate of endomorphic systems, could we not learn something from
viewing the universe as such or should we continue to view Star Dust,
from which we are also made, as having no such similar order , simply
a slave to gravity and/or matter just getting bumped around? Regards,
jj