In light of James Tobin's last post, Martin has requested that I forward his earlier response to me.
-- BEGIN included message
- To: terrafirma@ibm.net
- Subject: Re: O'Keefe
- From: Martin Horejsi <martinh@isu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 09:08:30 -0600
- In-Reply-To: <35488296.F320C248@ibm.net>
JJ wrote: To Martin: You stated, " Although he is (O'Keefe) in disagreement with most others about the origin of Tektites, his science and descriptive works are excellent." I am sure I am reading your statement incorrectly ( and admittedly, I have not read O'Keefe). You are not suggesting that his work is of lesser quality simply because it is unpopular? JJ, In no way am I making a judgment upon the work of others. Science is a process, and one must never forget that evidence in contradiction to current beliefs must cause the belief to be altered or abandoned (if not, you are dealing with politics or religion as Michael pointed out). Science is not a popularity contest, although the popularity of an idea often fuels its funding and public discussion. I believe many Americans feel comfortable with the concept of voting and with popular opinion being either completely correct or hiding some underlying conspiracy. My point involves neither. I looked at a body of research, and discussed the issue with planetary geologists, and made my observation that O'Keefe's ideas about the origin of tektites are less prevalent among scientists than those involving other origins. If you would like to read more into my statement based upon your desires for tektites to be from the moon, it is fine with me. I wish we knew their origin, and given a choice, the moon origin is my favorite. But I am not a researcher in the field of tektites, and thus my opinions can extend no farther than the counting of scientific papers that cross my desk. As one well-respected terrestrial volcanologist (and former lunar material researcher) once told me when we were discussing the tektite issue; when we start finding tektites in Antarctica along with lunar meteorites, he will then wonder about earlier research as to the origin of these objects. Until that time, the global distribution of tektites, and their chemical composition supports a terrestrial formation no matter what our wishes... the tektites don't care what we think, they are where they are from. Martin
-- END included message