-- BEGIN included message
- To: mblood@access1.net
- Subject: Re: New Locations > Serguei, > I have to agree with Walt on this idea; I would rather have new material > distibuted with a tentative classification than wait for it to be sold > out to institutions first. However, I do believe the Labenne EH3 > location should be described by this late date. (Only my opinion.) > DavidDavid Weir wrote: > > Serguei, > I have to agree with Walt on this idea; I would rather have new material > distibuted with a tentative classification than wait for it to be sold > out to institutions first. However, I do believe the Labenne EH3 > location should be described by this late date. (Only my opinion.) > David
- From: David Weir <dweir@mail.mco.bellsouth.net>
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 05:57:24 -0400
- References: <971009130200_-1261813968@emout14.mail.aol.com> <343E0568.3BAD@access1.net>
- Reply-To: dweir@mail.mco.bellsouth.net
Michael, If I were Luc Labenne I would not publish the exact coordinates for fear of others interloping on my rare find. However, I would see no harm in giving out some basic location information with the sale such as the country and the name of the nearest city or village. Do you see that as a problem Michael? David
-- END included message