[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Nuveo Mercurio B??
- To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Subject: Re: Nuveo Mercurio B??
- From: ALMitt@KCOnline.com
- Date: Sat, 03 May 97 05:20:01 GMT
- Old-X-Envelope-To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
- References: <TCPSMTP.17.5.3.4.1.40.2580465598.653711@kconline.com>
- Reply-To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Resent-Date: Sat, 3 May 1997 22:13:56 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-From: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"NP60VB.A.zBC.DD_az"@mu.pair.com>
- Resent-Sender: meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: Nuveo Mercurio B??
> Martin Horejsi wrote:
> >
> > On another note, there was some confusion in the past about a meteorite
> > called Nuevo Mercurio (B) that may have actually been a smuggled Australian
> > meteorite, possibly a ureilite. This name was given since the Mexican
> > government is not as protective of its meteorites compared to Australia.
> >
> > Let me know you thoughts.
> >
> > Martin
>
> Nova 003 (Reid 013 brachinite), Nuevo Murcurio B (Nullarbor 010
> ureilite. I forget what Nova 002 (CV3) may pair with... ah, the bad
> ole days!
>
> Incidentally, can someone tell me if the howardites Hughes 004 and
> Hughes 005 are paired?
>
> Joseph
Can someone enlighten me here or in private E-mail about the Nova 003 and the
Reid 013 brachinited and what that is all about.
--AL