[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Nuveo Mercurio B??

To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: Nuveo Mercurio B??
From: Joseph Murakami <jymurakami@pol.net>
Date: Fri, 02 May 1997 23:03:31 -0700
Old-X-Envelope-To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
References: <l03020901af9024293317@[134.50.61.77]>
Reply-To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Resent-Date: Sat, 3 May 1997 05:01:43 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-From: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Resent-Message-ID: <"3X8dZC.A.ALH.c7vaz"@mu.pair.com>
Resent-Sender: meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com

Martin Horejsi wrote:
 falling.
> 
> On another note, there was some confusion in the past about a meteorite
> called Nuevo Mercurio (B) that may have actually been a smuggled Australian
> meteorite, possibly a ureilite.  This name was given since the Mexican
> government is not as protective of its meteorites compared to Australia.
> 
> Let me know you thoughts.
> 
> Martin

Nova 003 (Reid 013 brachinite), Nuevo Murcurio B (Nullarbor 010
ureilite.  I forget what Nova 002 (CV3) may pair with...  ah, the bad
ole days!

Incidentally, can someone tell me if the howardites Hughes 004 and
Hughes 005 are paired?

Joseph

References:

Re: Nuveo Mercurio B??

From: Martin Horejsi <horemart@ba.isu.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Nuveo Mercurio B??
Next by Date: Gold and Diamonds
Next by thread: Re: meet at Riverside 5/24?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread