[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A new LL7 from Austrailia.
MARTIN G HOREJSI wrote:
>
> Hi Frank,
>
> Regarding the LL7, I've heard that there would be more LL7s, and L7s
> for that matter, except the petrologic number 7 was not accepted
> as a realistic classification much in the past. This means that
> several other LL6s and L6s could really be 7s if retested today. Do
> you know anything about this?
>
> Those who I have talked with said that 7s of anything were a little
> sketchy due to the early nature of the methods used to classify them.
> Could the place to look for more LL7s be in our collections?
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Martin
Frank and Martin,
For what it's worth, I've the mainmass for an E "7", Forrest 033,
Australia. Been worked on by Dr. Keil's group in Honolulu. I think
impact metamorphosis greater than 4.6 b.y... Interesting oriented
rivulets of metal even at 200x...
Joseph
References: