just an addition...an example.

Would people buy one of these Allende meteorites or similar from other
dealers pages which I think we are all pretty confident are Allende's...but
I'm pretty sure these were just fond in the same strewnfield and have not
been analysed to make sure.

https://impactika.com/product/allende-carbonaceous/

Graham

On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 4:46?PM Rhett Bourland <rhett.bourland at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Honestly, just because a meteorite is found in a known strewn field
> doesn't automatically make it part of the same fall.  Twink Monrad found
> Golden Rule and Golden Mile in the Gold Basin strewn field.  Calcalong
> Creek was originally sold as part of the Camel Donga strew field.  NWA482
> was originally thought to be a eucrite.  The folks who go to Antarctica
> each year go back to the same areas to find more because of the way
> glaciers move.
>
> When talking about how not getting everything classified is bad for
> science, that isn't just about common material being sold as something much
> rarer.  The real danger is rare and scientifically important pieces being
> sold as something more common.
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024, 10:22?AM Graham Ensor <graham.ensor at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I see no problem in anybody saying a probable meteorite is unclassified
>> but is likely to be a certain type. It is no different on line or throught
>> the met list than traveling through Morocco or visiting a show, looking at
>> hundreds of unclassified probable meteorites, and discussing the likelyhood
>> of that or what type they may be with the seller. That's the way many
>> dealers work to find unusual types that then get taken further to be
>> officially classified. I see no fault with a NWA seller working in this
>> way. The The fault comes if buyer does not then get it analysed or
>> classified and tries to sell it on as an authentic classified meteorite.
>> There are also thousands of meteorites amongst the hundreds of collections
>> that came through NWA dealers from established large strewnfields which sit
>> there as examples of a variety of falls/finds and have never been cut and
>> classified. Just found as part of a new fall/find as it's impossible for
>> every piece to be classified....examples are Chelyabinsk, Ribbeck, Erg
>> Chech 002, Tissint, Holbrook,...the list is endless. I suspect very few
>> collections consist of specimens where each individual has been classified
>> and most have individuals of those I've mentioned (or others) that have
>> never seen a scientist. If you are new to meteorites or have very little
>> experience then this is probably not the avenue for you to buy for a
>> collection unless you are happy to go to the trouble of getting analysis
>> done.
>>
>> G
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 2:32?PM Rhett Bourland via Meteorite-list <
>> meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Educated guesses aren't classifications.  Nobody can do that.  I've got
>>> close to a couple hundred pieces in my collection that I've built up over
>>> the past 25 years.  I own classes of meteorites that most museums don't
>>> even have because the museums that I got them from told me where the other
>>> pieces were.  I can safely say that I have handled and seen even more in
>>> that time.  The IMCA got started in my living room. I wouldn't even call
>>> something a meteorite unless it got tested.  As Anne Black recently said,
>>> people guessing what they have and presenting it as such is nothing but
>>> harmful for the science and commercial trade of these rocks and that woman
>>> has seen and handled stuff that I can only dream of.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024, 3:37?PM <mendy.ouzillou at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Rhett,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Our North African meteorite family has earned the right to make
>>>> educated guesses, especially after they have proven themselves to be
>>>> reputable dealers AND have examined the specimen. They have handled far
>>>> more meteorites than most dealers and collectors. There is no surprise that
>>>> they, and Mohamed in particular, can tell the difference between a CO and
>>>> another type of meteorite. Mohamed was fully transparent and clearly stated
>>>> that it is unclassified. There is nothing inauthentic about the posting.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have no ulterior motive in responding to this post other than
>>>> desiring respectful discourse.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Mendy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Meteorite-list <meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com> *On
>>>> Behalf Of *Rhett Bourland via Meteorite-list
>>>> *Sent:* Saturday, July 20, 2024 9:53 AM
>>>> *To:* Benzaki Mohamed <kemkemexpedition at gmail.com>
>>>> *Cc:* Meteorite List <Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite unclassified
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It's unclassified and yet you're calling it a CO?  That doesn't sound
>>>> very authentic to me.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jul 20, 2024, 10:17?AM Benzaki Mohamed via Meteorite-list <
>>>> meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all members hop have a good day.
>>>>
>>>>  Everyone interested will be interested by a largeste co carbonaceous
>>>> unclassified please contacte  me.all beste.
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>>>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________________________
>>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist2.pair.net/pipermail/meteorite-list/attachments/20240723/243c37fe/attachment-0001.htm>