[meteorite-list] We; ; researched, well documented, and way wrong: gloatting part 1
From: E.P. Grondine <epgrondine_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 13:51:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1211891403.9426694.1520430713251_at_mail.yahoo.com> Hi all, - Mt Grondine here to do a little gloating Message: 5Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 08:32:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Paul <bristolia at yahoo.com> Subject: [meteorite-list] The Imaginary Mucks of Alaska and Siberia ??? was??? "Arrowheads from NWA" To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com Message-ID: <20070611153243.84348.qmail at web36207.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 In the post "Arrowheads from NWA", Mr. Grondine wrote: ?The impact that produced the Alaskan and Siberian mucks, and altered the north Pacific currents, and the world's weather, are covered in my book "Man and Impact in the Americas".? One major problem is that the so-called "Alaskan and Siberian mucks" exist only in the very vivid imagination of various catastrophists, i.e. Deloria (1997), Hapgood (1970), and Velikovsky (1955). Over the last sixty years, numerous papers have shown that the descriptions of the so-called "Alaskan and Siberian mucks" by Hibben (1942, 1946) and Rainey (1940) are grossly incorrect and completely refuted the interpretations, which they have made of their catastrophic origin. A typical description of muck is: "In Alaska, for example, thick frozen deposits of volcanic ash, silts, sands, boulders, lenticles and ribbons of unmelted ice, and countless relics of late Pleistocene animals and plants lie jumbled together in no discernible order. This amazing deposit, usually referred to as 'muck', has been described by Dr Rainey as containing: '... enormous numbers of frozen bones of extinct animals, such as mammoth, mastodon, super bison and horse, as well as brush, stumps, moss and freshwater molluscs (281)'." It has now been proved that such descriptions are nothing more than imaginative fiction, which have been soundly refuted by over 50 years of research and numerous peer-reviewed papers and monographs, which have been published by the Quaternary geologist, who have studied these deposits for decades. As proved by numerous published peer-reviewed papers and monographs, including Berger (2003), Bettis et al. (2003), Guthrie (1990), McDowell and Edwards (2001), Muhs et al. (2001, 2003, 2004), Pewe (1955, 1975a, 1975b, 1989), and Westgate et al. (1990), the claim that these deposits consist of? "thick frozen deposits of volcanic ash, silts, sands, boulders, lenticles and ribbons of unmelted ice, and countless relics of late Pleistocene animals and plants lie jumbled together in no discernible order" is false. Instead, as described in numerous publications, specifically Guthrie (1990), Muhs et al. (2003), Pewe (1955, 1975a, 1975b, 1989), and Westgate et al. (1990), the deposits, which are often referred to as ?Alaskan muck? consist of a well-ordered, layer-cake sequence of stratigraphic units containing distinct paleosols and buried forests with in situ tree stumps. As seen in Figures 20 and 29 of Pewe (1975); Figure 4 of Pewe et al. (1997); and the measured sections of Westgate et al. (1990), the so-called ?muck? consists of well- defined geologic layers, which are only jumbled where the surface has been disturbed by either thermokarst, landslides, solifluction, or some combination of these processes. The total thickness of the Quaternary deposits, which have been designated as ?muck? is only 10 to 20 m (33 to 66 ft) as their thickest, which become thinner upslope. Satrting with Pewe (1955), Quaternary geologists have recognized the presence of 7 well-defined stratigraphic units, which the deposits that are falsely described as being ?jumbled together in no discernible order?. Some of these stratigraphic units, i.e. the Ready Bullion Formation, Engineer Loess, Goldstream Formation, Gold Hill Loess, and the Fairbanks Loess, consist of silt, which have been demonstrated to consist of a combination of? wind-blown silt called "loess" and sediments moved down-hill by slopewash and solifluction. Some stratigraphic units, i.e. the Dawson Cut and Eva Formations, contain buried, in situ forests that are rooted in "fossil" soils, which are called ?paleosols?. Other stratigraphic units , i.e. the Tanana Formation, Fox Gravel, and Cripple Gravel, consist of gravels, which often contain gold and demonstrated to have been deposited by streams (Bettis et al. 2003; Pewe 1955, 1975a, 1975b, 1989; Pewe et al. 1997; Westgate et al. 1990; Muhs et al. 2001, 2003, 2004). In addition, the contacts between these stratigraphic units are well-defined, persistent, and easily mappable. The forest beds, ice-wedge casts, and buried soils, which are found associated with the contacts demonstrate the periods of nondeposition lasting thousands to tens of thousands years occurred between the deposition different stratigraphic units. They soundly refute the claim that the ?Alaskan muck? accumulated during a single catastrophic event. Even within individual stratigraphic units, paleosols can be found indicating that the accumulation of sediments comprising individual them was not continuous being interrupted by periods of either nondeposition and landscape stability or erosion (Bettis et al. 2003; Pewe 1955, 1975a, 1975b, 1989; Pewe et al. 1997; Westgate et al. 1990; Muhs et al. 2001, 2003, 2004). Rainey (1940) and Hibbens (1942, 1946) were wrong in their claims that the remains plant and animal fossils occur randomly together throughout the ?Alaskan muck?. The fossils, rather subfossils of trees are typically limited to one of three buried forest beds, which have been mapped within the so-called ?Alaskan muck?. For example as shown in Figure 29 of Pewe (1975a), buried forest containing in situ tree stumps at the top of the Fox Gravel, the Gold Hill Loess, and the Goldstream Loess. Each of these buried forests are characterized by the in situ stumps of mature trees rooted in buried soils developed in the top of each of these units (Pewe 1975a, 1975b, 1989; Pewe et al. 1997). These buried forests consist of the stumps and fallen trunks of forests buried in place by colluvial deposits or solifluction lobes. Papers and monographs published in the last fifty years have shown the claims and descriptions made by Rainey (1940) and Hibben (1942, 1946) concerning the abundance and distribution of fossil bones to be grossly exaggerated and quite inaccurate. Mr. Grondine continued: " It is too bad these mucks are not absolutely dated yet. But 11,000 BCE would be a late date for Bessey's "arrowheads" (points) - most are likely far older." The fact of the matter is that both the ?Alaskan and Siberian mucks? have been repeatedly dated by luminescence and optical stimulated luminescence dating and dating of any volcanic ash layers found in them. The younger ?muck deposits? have been dated by radiocarbon dating and the archaeological remains, which they contain. These dates demonstrate that the sediments, which are haphazardly and incorrectly lumped together as a single ?Alaskan muck?, episodically accumulated over a period of 2 to 3 million years, with the youngest deposits having accumulated as recently as 7,000 to 8,000 years ago. The youngest forest bed, the Eva Forest Bed, dates to the last interglacial, about 125,000 years ago as determined by Pewe et al. (1997). It and the ?muck? beneath it are far too old to be related to any terminal Pleistocene catastrophe. The oldest forest bed, the Dawson Cut Forest Bed, has been found to be almost 2 million years old by Westgate et al. (2003). These dates, paleosols, and in situ forest beds, indicate that the ?Alaskan muck? did not accumulate as the result of one event, but rather represents periods during which loess and other sediments accumulated separated by very long periods, thousands to tens of thousands of years, during which there was a? lack of any accumulation of ?muck? (Berger 2003, Muhs et al. (2001, 2003, 2004), Pewe (1955, 1975a, 1975b, 1989), Pewe et al. (1997), and Westgate et al. (1990). In case of the ?Siberian muck?, there are numerous published, peer-reviewed papers and monographs, which also refute all of what Deloria (1997), Hapgood (1970), Velikovsky (1955), and others have written about it. What these papers and monographs prove is that the so-called ?Siberian muck?, like the ?Alaskan mucks? consist of multiple well-defined and recognizable stratigraphic units that are **not ** ?jumbled together in no discernible order?. They demonstrate that many of these units typically occur in an ordered and predictable layer caked fashion and are both separated by and internally contain well defined paleosols, which represent periods during, which the deposition of the so-called ?Siberian muck? ceased for periods of hundreds to thousands and tens of thousands years and allowed the formation of mature soils. The Siberian muck as described by Deloria (1997), Hapgood (1970), and Velikovsky (1955), exists only in the rather vivid imagination of these writers. In addition these publications contain numerous luminescence, optical stimulated luminescence, and radiocarbon dates along with artifacts found within them, that date the age of the various stratigraphic units comprising the ?Siberian muck?. At one location, these dates and paleosols show distinct periods during which the ?Siberian muck? accumulated? between 18,000 to 28,000 BP, around 40,000 to 50,000 BP, and about 89,000 BP (Frechen and Yamskikh 1999). Rutter et al. (2003) dated individual stratigraphic units within the ?Siberian muck?, which are separated by paleosols, as being as old as 88,000, 101,000 to 109,000, and 130,000 BP. These and many, many other dates soundly and repeatedly refute any connection between the deposition of the ?Siberian muck? and any terminal Pleistocene catastrophe. (Note this is a revision of previous essay, which I have written about the ?Alaskan muck?.) References: Berger, Glenn W., 2003, Luminescence chronology of Late Pleistocene loess-paleosol and tephra sequences near Fairbanks, Alaska. Quaternary Research. vol. 60, no. 1, Pages 70-83. Bettis, E. A., Muhs, D. R., Robert, H. M., and Wintle, A. G., 2003, Last Glacial loess in the conterminous USA. Quaternary Science Reviews. vol. 22, no. 18-19, pp. 1907-1946 Deloria, Vine, Jr., 1997, Red Earth, White Lies: Native Americans and the Myth of Scientific Fact. Fulcrum Publishing. Golden, Colorado. Frenchen, M., and Yamskikh, 1995, Upper Pleistocene loess stratigraphy in the southern Yenisei Siberia area. Jounral of the Geological Society of London. vol. 156, pp. 515-525. Gutherie, R. D., 1990, Frozen Fauna of the Mammoth Steppes: The Story of Blue Babe. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois. Hapgood, C. H., 1970, The Path of The Pole. Chilton Book Company. New York, New York. Hibben, Frank C., 1942, Evidences of early man in Alaska. American Antiquity. vol. 8, pp. 254-259. Hibben, Frank C., 1946. Lost Americans. Crowell. New York, New York. Muhs, D. R., Ager T. A., and Beg?t, J. E., 2001, Vegetation and paleoclimate of the last interglacial period, central Alaska Quaternary Science Reviews. vol.? 20, no. 1-3, pp. 41-61. Muhs, D. R., McGeehin, J. P, Beann, J., and Fisher, E., 2004, Holocene loess deposition and soil formation as competing processes, Matanuska Valley, southern Alaska. Quaternary Research. vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 265-276 Muhs, D. R., Ager, T. A., and Beg?t, J., 2004, Stratigraphy and palaeoclimatic significance of Late Quaternary loess?palaeosol sequences of the Last Interglacial?Glacial cycle in central Alaska. Quaternary Science Reviews. vol. 22, no. 18-19, pp. 1947-1986. McDowell, P. F., and Edwards, M. E., 2001, Evidence of Quaternary climatic variations in a sequence of loess and related deposits at Birch Creek, Alaska: implications for the Stage 5 climatic chronology. Quaternary Science Reviews, vol. 20, no.1-3, pp. 63-76. Pewe, T. L., 1955, Origin of the upland silt near Fairbanks, Alaska. Geological Society of America Bulletin. vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 699-724. Pewe, T. L., 1975a, Quaternary Geology of Alaska. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 835, 145 pp. http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/usgspubs/pp/pp835 Pewe, T. L., 1975b, Quaternary Stratigraphic Nomenclature in Central Alaska. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper no. 862, 32 pp. http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/usgspubs/pp/pp862 Pewe, T. L., 1989, Quaternary stratigraphy of the Fairbanks area, Alaska. in Late Cenozoic History of the Interior Basins of Alaska and the Yukon. U.S. Geological Survey Circular no. 1026, pp. 72-77. Pewe, T. L., Berger, G. W., Westgate, J. A., Brown, P. A., and Leavitt, S. W., 1997, Eva Interglacial Forest Bed, Unglaciated East-Central Alaska. Geological Society of America Special Paper no. 319, 54 pp. Rainey, F., 1940, Archaeological Investigations in Alaska. American Antiquity. vol. 5, pp. 299-308. Rutter, N. W., Rokosh, D., Evans, M. E., Little, E. C., Chlachula, J., and Velichko, A., 2003, Correlation and interpretation of paleosols and loess across European Russia and Asia over the last interglacial-glacial cycle. Quaternary Research. vol. 60, no. 1, Pages 101-109. Velikovsky, Immanuel, 1955. Earth in Upheaval. Doubleday and Company, Garden City, New York. Westgate, J. A., Stemper, B. A., and Pewe, T. L., 1990, A 3 m.y. record of Pliocene-Pleistocene loess in interior Alaska. Geology. vol. 18, no. 9, p. 858-861. Westgate, John A., Preece, Shari J., and Pewe, Troy L., 2003, The Dawson Cut Forest Bed in the Fairbanks area, Alaska, is about two million years old. Quaternary Research. vol. 60, no. 1, Pages 2-8. Yours, Paul -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/private/meteorite-list/attachments/20180307/47fb65b8/attachment.html> Received on Wed 07 Mar 2018 08:51:53 AM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |