[meteorite-list] 10 Mislabeled Meteorites - Meteorite lot $1.99 starting bid

From: John Cabassi <john_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 18:03:34 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFBTX4wsvYN2woQ82S5=-bDjmKQVaO=Ms_OBFc_O-ZvahHMxBw_at_mail.gmail.com>

No crime. Just making a statement John.
People are so edgy these days with everything

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Bigjohn Shea <bigjohnshea at mail.com> wrote:
> So my crime is what...?
>
> That I didn't want people to think they were "mislabeled" when they really weren't?
>
> -chin scratching-
>
> Okay... Well have a good night!
> Cheers,
> John
>
>
>
>
>
> Sent using the mail.com mail app
>
> On 8/16/17 at 7:55 PM, John Cabassi wrote:
>
>> Yes Ruben, it was a bonus for those that wanted to research it. I had
>> at least 90% which was obvious but Big John decided to blow it but
>> that's good. Now you're going to get a lot more bids
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Ruben Garcia via Meteorite-list
>> <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> wrote:
>> > Thank you Luc and John, you're both obviously smarter than I am. But
>> > like I said, If someone is willing to take a few minutes to do
>> > research they might get a good deal.
>> >
>> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Bigjohn Shea <bigjohnshea at mail.com> wrote:
>> >> ALOT of them are not mislabelled, just abbreviated.
>> >>
>> >> Great Sand Sea 012, from the Egyptian DCA Great Sand Sea, that specimen simply never got classified as the official DCA skips from 009 to 019.
>> >>
>> >> Tagounite 001 and 019 are just informally numbered specimens from the unofficial DCA of Tagounite.
>> >>
>> >> Nwa 703 is simply a provisional specimen.
>> >>
>> >> Kaigorod is simply another name for Vyatka
>> >>
>> >> etc. etc.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> John A. Shea, MD
>> >> IMCA 3295
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Sent using the mail.com mail app
>> >>
>> >> On 8/16/17 at 3:34 PM, Ruben Garcia via Meteorite-list wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> These specimens are not in the meteorite bulletin as they are labeled.
>> >>> This means that the provisional name or the field name was not used as
>> >>> was assumed at the time of labeling. So one would need to take each
>> >>> specimen one by one and do a little detective work via the internet to
>> >>> determine it's true name and then to see if it has been classified.
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm just to lazy to do it, so a little research can save you money!
>> >>>
>> >>> http://www.ebay.com/itm/10-Mislabeled-Meteorites-Meteorite-lot-A-little-research-can-save-you-/222615380090?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Rock On!
>> >>>
>> >>> Ruben Garcia
>> >>>
>> >>> www.RubenMrMeteoriteGarcia.com
>> >>> ______________________________________________
>> >>>
>> >>> Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
>> >>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> >>> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>> >>> https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Rock On!
>> >
>> > Ruben Garcia
>> >
>> > www.RubenMrMeteoriteGarcia.com
>> > ______________________________________________
>> >
>> > Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
>> > Meteorite-list mailing list
>> > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>> > https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Wed 16 Aug 2017 09:03:34 PM PDT