[meteorite-list] The US World Record Mars Meteorite Discovery
From: Galactic Stone & Ironworks <meteoritemike_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 10:44:56 -0500 Message-ID: <CAKBPJW-dA16z+NwH7gNLa-1_O623sONZUpegY9LjZf29C8-9Pg_at_mail.gmail.com> This is absolute hogwash. I have no background in academia, no academic credentials, and before meteorites, I cut trees for a living. I did not know anyone, I did not know the rules, I was a total newcomer back in 2007. I was embraced with open arms, despite the fact that I came across as abrasive and cocky. Multiple scientists have been very nice and accommodating to me. They have looked at some of my specimens that I submitted, and one of them was classified as an LL3.6 - at no cost to me other than postage. There are no conspiracies to keep newcomers out or to silence their discoveries. If that was true, then I wouldn't be here right now. Shut your foolish mouth before and take this load of tin-foil-hat conspiracy shit to Alex Jones - where bullshit is appreciated and spread widely. Or, get together with Goran Lindfors and Steve Curry and have a circle jerk - you are wasting your time here. Yes, I know, I just went on your conspiracy list. I am a lizard man from the Pleiades and I eat babies in the name of Satan. On 1/15/16, Ann Cain via Meteorite-list <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> wrote: > > Meteorite List, > > > Recall: > Both my sister Ann Cain (who opened the email account) and I, Glyn Howard, > use the same email account: > > Ann Cain, Glyn Howard > gfndit(at)hotmail.com > > > > This has been a long time coming ... for many years now I have been a reader > of the Meteorite List. > > I know this discovery sounds Wow! Unbelievable. Surreal. Pick your > adjective. But it is what is is. All the physical empirical evidences prove > it. I'm not in fear of re-confirmation. I welcome it. I know what it is. > It's all repeatable (empirical). > > I appreciate well-known PhD members from the Meteorite List who have > contacted me off-line. I will respond. Please give me time. > > > The evidence for the typical Mars meteorite key type specimens for this > discovery: > > GSA and GSB > > http://gfoundit-mars.com/TheEvidence.html > > http://gfoundit-mars.com/TheEvidenceGSA.html > > http://gfoundit-mars.com/TheEvidenceGSB.html > > > The Gallery of US World Record Mars Meteorite specimens: > > http://gfoundit-mars.com/GalleryOfImages.html > > > I will be putting-up/finishing the gallery of World Record Mars meteorite > specimens by this Passover. > > > > I do not want to hurt anyone's professional reputation. I'm not a mean or > vengeful person. The full complete back story and certain people's > identities will remain private. Just know there is a private history in the > background of this incredible discovery and full story. Several very well > known PhDs at Universities in the meteoritics community, who are meteorite > analysts, members of the Meteoritcal Society, and perhaps at times over the > years have even posted here on the Meteorite List, have held some of these > specimens in their hands, have done tests. They know. I knew they were > meteorites before I came to them. I knew that they were achondrites. > However, at the time I couldn't prove the parent body. I didn't know how. > > The moment I wasn't willing to share or reveal the discovery site is the > moment the road-blocks, the walls, the disinformation began toward me. > (Extrusive igneous Dacite, an evolved lava, is not a sedimentary rock! Lol.) > We've seen this kind of behavior in the meteoritcs community before. It's > nothing new, sadly. This is a dark history of the meteoritics world > unfortunately. How many very rare important discoveries have been lost to > the world of science and to mankind because those in research and academia > have played unethical games of gate-keeping and have refused to just do > their job and just do pure science and do the analysis honestly and > ethically without games, without gate-keeping, without attempting to wrestle > from the discoverer the original discovery site? The discoverer has a right > to withhold the discovery site to guard their discovery and its full value, > and to protect it. How many people over the many years couldn't persevere > against this wall, this unethical gate-keeping because they didn't have the > prerequisite skills or knowledge and they weren't able to realize that they > were lied to or purposefully fed disinformation, and as a result had to walk > away and give up, with an incredible treasure of scientific knowledge and > wealth in their hand? It could of been very different. It could have been a > very cooperative process of discovery for everyone. > > The original discoverer has rights. I've said it before , and I'll keep > saying it ... > > It takes discoverers to make scientific discoveries. Doing science and > making scientific discoveries is not a crime. There is a right to protect > discoveries and intellectual property. > > > "Contrary to their public image, scientists are normal, flawed human beings. > They are as capable of prejudice, covetousness, pride, deceitfulness, etc., > as anyone." > -- David Weatherall, "Conduct Unbecoming," American Scientist (Vol.93, > January-February 2005), p.73 > http://www.americanscientist.org/bookshelf/pub/conduct-unbecoming > > > As it turns out I'm rather glad it happened the way it did. Nothing like > purposeful road-blocks, gate-keeping, and disinformation thrown at me to > motivate me to learn to how to do it myself. As the old adage goes, if you > want something done right you have to do it yourself. The Earth Sciences > are my background. I have the prerequisite skills. It took time but I did > it. I'm still learning. I never stop learning. I didn't do it in a vacuum. I > had much help and assistance along the way, from very good, professional > scientists and technicians who were very ethical and very knowledgeable and > very helpful, and then they did their assigned jobs very professionally and > willingly. One day when the story can be told completely in detail I will > certainly call out personally all those who helped me. The others who > didn't, I will anonymously thank for motivating me to learn meteoritics and > to learn to do it on my own. I have enjoyed the scientific process > immensely. Much more to come. And I can prove what I know. > > Why when making the discovery of meteorites in the field, why then give away > the scientific analysis and identification process to another? Why not learn > how to do it for yourself so that your knowledge of the science of > meteoritics increases? Why give away that joy of this discovery process? > Sure I understand that many can't do it or perhaps they aren't interested in > the whole scientific process, but I am. Why not go after the full credit for > the full discovery -- from the field, to the lab, all the way to the > publication? Sure there are tests I cannot do, others will do these tests > afterwards. However, it doesn't change the fact that I made this WR > meteorite field discovery, and in the lab I proved they are meteorites, > proved the petrology, and then proved the Parent Body of origin for this > achondrite meteorite find. The PB is Mars. I was able to prove all of this > first. Others will re-confirm second. And others will go much further > thereafter. There is an incredible amount of pure science about Mars to > learn from this full discovery. I would like to be intimately involved in > that with my full discovery. I'm sure this US World Record Mars Meteorite > Discovery will make many careers for many scientists for a long time to > come. NASA Houston Space Command will have to add another adjacent building > to Building 31, or at least expand, just to store the new Mars material. I > have no doubt about that. > > If a tree falls in the forest and no-one is there to hear it or witness the > event ... guess what it still fell! The event still happened and made a > sound. Likewise the discovery of and the science of meteorites (meteoritics) > still takes place outside of the formal controlling walls of The > Meteoritical Society and official publication in The Bulletin. There will be > time for that down the road. > > When a World Record discovery occurs on this level, you do not give the keys > away to the discovery. I have a right to guard my discovery and its full > value to help the greatest number of people. It is possible to make > incredible discoveries, do incredible and exciting science, and achieve > social justice for many many people all at the same time. It's the right > thing to do. I intend to do just that. There is a reason this discovery was > given to me to make. Tikkun olam. Baruch HaShem. > > > > Glyn Howard > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________ > > Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the > Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > -- ------------------------------------------------------------- Web - http://www.galactic-stone.com Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone Pinterest - http://pinterest.com/galacticstone -------------------------------------------------------------Received on Fri 15 Jan 2016 10:44:56 AM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |