[meteorite-list] How the Sun Protects Earth from Asteroid Impacts

From: Ron Baalke <baalke_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 14:59:12 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <201602192259.u1JMxDkH021186_at_zagami.jpl.nasa.gov>

https://www.helsinki.fi/en/news/asteroids-are-not-destroyed-in-an-impact-with-the-sun

Asteroids are not destroyed in an impact with the Sun
University of Helsinki
February 18, 2016

Puzzling asteroid and meteor observations can now be explained.

For two decades it was thought that most near-Earth objects (NEOs) end
their existence in a dramatic final plunge into the Sun. A new study published
in the journal Nature finds instead that most of those objects are destroyed
much farther from the Sun than previously thought.

This surprising new discovery explains several puzzling asteroid and meteor
observations that have been reported in recent years.

- Initially our aim was to construct a state-of-the-art model of the NEO
population that is needed for planning future asteroid surveys and spacecraft
missions, says planetary scientist Mikael Granvik, currently at the University
of Helsinki.

The best-ever model

The model that describes the NEOs' orbit and size distributions was completed
as planned, but the research also led to an important advance in asteroid
research.

- We modelled different observational selection effects, and combined
them with observational data and NEOs' well-understood, statistical orbit
distributions that vary depending on an NEO's specific source region in
the main asteroid belt.

But the team noticed that their model had a problem: the number of NEOs
detected was 5 per cent less than the model predicted. They then spent
a year verifying their calculations before they came to the conclusion
that the problem was not in their analysis but in their assumptions of
how the Solar System works.

The model was then modified to the new hypothesis that NEOs are destroyed
if they spend too much time within about 10 solar diameters of the Sun,
and this lead to an excellent agreement between the model and the observed
population of NEOs.

Why some meteor streams lack parent objects

The team's discovery helps to explain several other discrepancies between
observations and predictions of the distribution of small objects in our
Solar System.

- Astronomers have been unable to match most of the meteor streams on
orbits closely approaching the Sun with known parent objects, says Granvik.

He and his research team now suggest that the parent objects were completely
destroyed when they came too close to the Sun.

The team can now also explain why NEOs that approach closer to the Sun
are brighter than those that keep their distance from the Sun.

Darker asteroids are more easily destroyed

- Darker asteroids that have been orbiting closer to the Sun have already
been destroyed. The fact that dark objects are more easily destroyed implies
that dark and bright asteroids have a different internal composition and,
possibly, structure.

According to Granvik, their discovery of the catastrophic loss of asteroids
before a collision with the Sun allows planetary scientists to understand
a variety of recent observations from a new perspective.

- Perhaps the most intriguing outcome of this study is that it shows that
it shows that one must account for the asteroids' physical properties
when constructing population models.

- In simple terms one can say that it is now possible to test models of
asteroid interiors simply by keeping track of their orbits and sizes.

This research led by Mikael Granvik is published in Nature, 18 February.
Received on Fri 19 Feb 2016 05:59:12 PM PST