[meteorite-list] R: friction or ram pressure?
From: Sterling K. Webb <sterling_k_webb_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 18:41:54 -0600 Message-ID: <688372.97353.bm_at_smtp111.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Hi, all, > the hot air heats the front > surface of the meteoroid... That's where the complexity is hiding. The rammed air "jacket" is hotter the deeper you get into it. The layer closest to the meteoroid is the hottest, achieving the plasma state and temperatures --- 30,000F to 50,000F. Plasma does not heat anything much by "contact." Instead, plasma at those temperatures transfer heat by radiation. The rammed air layers ahead are converted to plasma by radiation until all but the outermost layer of the "jacket" is plasma. The technical term for this "jacket" is the "meteor head." On the inner side of the "meteor head," the plasma transfers heat to the meteoroid, by radiation. The spectrum of 30,000F plasma runs from long radio waves to soft x-rays. (You can Google up how to "listen" to meteors by radio.) It's the other end of the spectrum that has the most powerful effect on meteoroid rock. Soft x-rays can boil rock 10,000 times faster than your microwave can overcook a chicken pot pie. Areas of lower boiling point get excavated faster, forming regmaglypts. Regmaglypts are also caused by the irregularities in the meteoroid's shape which affect the meteor head's shape. Between the plasma and the rock face there is little heat transferred by conduction. Radiative transfer is the predominant mechanism. "Rock" plasma and atmospheric plasma mix as the plasma escapes by moving from the center of the meteoroid face back 90 degrees to the point where it can be "shed" into the trail, combining as the plasma cools to the point where atoms CAN combine into meteoritic "dust." They can be seen as areas of the trail just behind the meteoroid described as "burning." There is little physical contact between the meteoroid and the plasma in our usual sense; hot as it is, it's not very dense by Earthly standards, just more dense than the atmosphere at 60 miles altitude. But, it's just 5 or 10 times hotter than the surface of the Sun. That does the trick very nicely. "Friction" is not really an adequate term for the heating mechanism. Assuming a generally spherical shape for the meteoroid, to travel back half the meteoroid's diameter to reach the point where the tail detaches it must traverse a distance of 0.78 the meteoroid's diameter, hence, there must be a radial "plasma wind" accelerating across the face of the meteoroid to a velocity 57% greater than that of the meteoroid itself. We assume this is responsible for the flow lines. Here's some more (technical) information for those more fascinated. First, an excellent general summary of radar studies of meteor heads and trails here: http://www.cas.uio.no/Publications/Seminar/Convergence_Dyrud.pdf More technical treatments here: http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/4/817/2004/acp-4-817-2004.pdf and here: http://ftp.rta.nato.int/public/PubFullText/RTO/MP/RTO-MP-IST-056/MP-IST-056- 12.pdf and then there's this tome (seriously; it's a book!): http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1177&context=etd A lot of this stuff is hotly debated. How many tons of meteors are delivered to Earth every year? They're fighting over that. How many meteors a year? Fighting. And so on. Enjoy. Sterling K. Webb ------------------------------------------------ -----Original Message----- From: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com [mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Francesco Moser Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2014 1:22 PM To: Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com Subject: [meteorite-list] R: friction or ram pressure? Thanks for your kind answer! So we can say: meteoroids dimensions: <~1cm "friction" >~1cm ram pressure But I have still a question... how the ablation process works on the bigger meteoroids? The ram pressure heats the air, the hot air heats the front surface of the meteoroid to the fusion/sublimation temperature, right? But is the collisional process that create oriented shape, ragmaglipts, flow line ... or what else process?? Thanks <x>x<x>x<x> Francesco -----Messaggio originale----- Da: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com [mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] Per conto di Chris Peterson Inviato: sabato 25 gennaio 2014 16:24 A: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com Oggetto: Re: [meteorite-list] friction or ram pressure? Your understanding is broadly correct, although I don't think "friction" is quite the right word to describe the heating process for particles smaller than about a centimeter. The mechanism of heating depends on the particle size and on the mean free path of atmospheric molecules (and therefore on height). For centimeter scale particles, most of the heating is the result of creating a compressed gas zone along the leading edge. For millimeter scale particles the heating involves collisional processes. Not surprisingly, there's an intermediate range where both processes are operating. Chris ******************************* Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com On 1/25/2014 7:54 AM, Francesco Moser wrote: > Hi all! > I have a question for you regarding falling stars and fireballs! > Which is the physical process that heats a meteoroid during his travel through the atmosphere? > Is the friction with the air molecules or the ram pressure of the > shock wave in front of the meteoroid? > > I think, but maybe I'm wrong: > for the smaller meteoroids like the one that generate the falling > stars the main process is the friction, instead for the bigger meteoroid like the one that generate meteorite on the ground or for example for a Space Ship like the Space Shuttle the main process is the ram pressure ... I'm right? > > Thanks a lot!!! > > <x>x<x>x<x> > Francesco ______________________________________________ Received on Sat 25 Jan 2014 07:41:54 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |