[meteorite-list] KATOL (L6) is official
From: Jim Wooddell <jim.wooddell_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 09:36:43 -0700 Message-ID: <52C5959B.6060300_at_suddenlink.net> Some comments that have been made suggest no chondrules, yet there they are in the BSE images. Laurence does give their sizes in the write up and they tend to be really small (200 - 700 um), but not really uncommon. Because of their size, could that be why some are missing them when they look at it and say no chondrules? Jim On 1/2/2014 9:10 AM, Carl Agee wrote: > Mike, > > Given the wide range of lithologies we are hearing about, all I am > saying it might be interesting to test the multiple lithologies and > confirm what you are saying. I am not suggesting anything about > multiple bodies or not, I don't have an opinion. I am simply > describing how you could provide geochem evidence to form a well > supported hypothesis. By the way, Laurence's BSE's on FB are > unequivocal L6 -- nice equilibrated chondrules! > > Carl > ************************************* > Carl B. Agee > Director and Curator, Institute of Meteoritics > Professor, Earth and Planetary Sciences > MSC03 2050 > University of New Mexico > Albuquerque NM 87131-1126 > > Tel: (505) 750-7172 > Fax: (505) 277-3577 > Email: agee at unm.edu > http://meteorite.unm.edu/people/carl_agee/ > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2014.0.4259 / Virus Database: 3658/6969 - Release Date: 01/02/14 > > -- Jim Wooddell jim.wooddell at suddenlink.net http://pages.suddenlink.net/chondrule/Received on Thu 02 Jan 2014 11:36:43 AM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |