[meteorite-list] Norwegian skydiver nearly struck by meteorite
From: rickmont at earthlink.net <rickmont_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 17:08:28 -0700 Message-ID: <D91BB5CB6B3C4A07B45A619A56DA8327_at_bosoheadPC> Pretty good production work (I saw Star Wars one time, and thoroughly enjoyed the epic award-winning animation "Bolt" (you've all gotta see it...its great!)...yet soooo many posts I'm not going to wade through them all. Meteorite in the room question (which probably has already been posted): what happened to the stone? If I'm Mr. Skydiver Guy, I'd follow it. Just sayin' -----Original Message----- From: Michael Farmer Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 3:12 PM To: Galactic Stone & Ironworks Cc: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Norwegian skydiver nearly struck by meteorite The internet is filled with production quality fake videos and stunts. Anyone with a $2000 Mac and a go-pro and some editing software can work magic these days. Why is this one any more believable than the kid who said he had his head cut by a meteorite? The news eats this crap up as fast as it can, yet when real meteorites fall, usually zero interest. Michael Farmer Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 3, 2014, at 2:58 PM, "Galactic Stone & Ironworks" > <meteoritemike at gmail.com> wrote: > > I would be more impressed if a scuba diver was struck by a meteorite. ;) > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > Web - http://www.galactic-stone.com > Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone > Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone > Pinterest - http://pinterest.com/galacticstone > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> On 4/3/14, Chris Peterson <clp at alumni.caltech.edu> wrote: >> Yes, although with his shoot deployed, he's probably traveling fairly >> slowly with respect to terminal velocity. >> >> Chris >> >> ******************************* >> Chris L Peterson >> Cloudbait Observatory >> http://www.cloudbait.com >> >>> On 4/3/2014 2:13 PM, Michael Mulgrew wrote: >>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Chris Peterson wrote: >>>> I'd put the terminal velocity for a stone of that apparent size between >>>> 50 >>>> and 100 m/s. Say, between 100 and 200 mph (and I'd lean towards the >>>> lower >>>> end given the tumbling). >>> >>> The sky divers are falling, so the relative speed between them and the >>> rock would be even less than the rock's terminal velocity. >>> >>> Michael in so. Cal. >> ______________________________________________ >> >> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com >> Meteorite-list mailing list >> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > > -- > ______________________________________________ > > Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list Received on Thu 03 Apr 2014 08:08:28 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |