[meteorite-list] Fw: Video 5 of SLP, MX Bolide now, posted! Another spectacular video.

From: Count Deiro <countdeiro_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 14:58:40 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
Message-ID: <26001500.1378504721375.JavaMail.root_at_wamui-june.atl.sa.earthlink.net>

Hi Listers,

Well....it sure is a pretty sucker....the guy, or gal that went to all that trouble is talented to say the least! I still enjoy looking at the videos. I'm just not ready yet to throw in the towel.

Count Deiro
IMCA 3536

-----Original Message-----
>From: Marco Langbroek <marco.langbroek at online.nl>
>Sent: Sep 6, 2013 9:30 AM
>To: Meteorite List <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>, countdeiro at earthlink.net
>Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Fw: Video 5 of SLP, MX Bolide now, posted! Another spectacular video.
>
>
>Count Deiro wrote:
>
>> As they say...."with all due respect"....to those of you with vastly more
>> experience than I in the subject....these old eyes and the brain they are
>> attached to have digested the visual data, then thought out the technical
>> complexities involved in producing a series of multiple fakes while
>> estimating the cost in time and money that would be involved and finally,
>> pondered why anyone would spend that time and treasure....and for what
>> possible purpose. Conclusion? The San Luis Potosi bolide and its history so
>> stunningly recorded are the "real deal".
>
>I humbly disagree.
>
>There are multiple reasons why people would have faked this.
>
>Over the past few years we have seen multitudes of fake UFO video's, fake videos
>of strange "archaeological" finds (e.g. "giants" a few years ago), fake
>"surviving mammoth filmed in Siberia" video's, fake Loch Ness videos, fake
>"eagle snatches kid in the park" videos, you name it. Nowadays, these kind of
>animations can be done with off the shelf software that is readily available.
>
>Reasons to make such fake movies can be very diverse:
>
>- People like to fool other people;
>- Maybe someone wants to practise their CGI skills;
>- Maybe someone made this as a practical exam assignment;
>- Maybe someone created this as a "proof of concept" for potential customers;
>- Maybe this is intended as a viral for an upcoming movie or game;
>- Maybe this is made for an upcoming movie or game
>
>... to name just a few options.
>
>The 'Eagle snatches kid in the park" video of a year ago for example, was an
>exam product created by university students.
>
>The video's of this fireball that surfaced are too similar in composition and
>quality, and too 'neat' - with very smooth panning for example, rather than
>shakey panic. As Rob mentioned, some are weird - why was the person capturing
>the fireball filming in the first place? In some video's, it appears the filmer
>is actually *waiting* for the fireball to appear. And on some of the video's,
>the "fireball" really looks CGI if you look carefully (in the train video for
>example, and the one where it disappears behind a hill). Then there are the
>other things that don't ad up as pointed out by Rob earlier.
>To top it, all these video's appear out of nowhere on new YouTube accounts, or
>youtube accounts that collect dubious movies.
>
>These video's therefore really do not answer to the pattern of casual
>eyewitnesses. Moreover, there shouldn't be just these video's: TV stations,
>Radio stations, police, observatories, they should have been flooded by
>eyewitness reports....
>
>Nowadays, you simply have to be suspicious. Too many people like to play with
>CGI and unlike 10 years ago, it is no longer the domain of professionals (nor
>very expensive). A 19-year-old on his parents loft can do it.
>
>- Marco
>
>-----
>Dr Marco (asteroid 183294) Langbroek
>Dutch Meteor Society (DMS)
>
>e-mail: dms at marcolangbroek.nl
>http://www.dmsweb.org
>http://www.marcolangbroek.nl
>-----
>
>
>
Received on Fri 06 Sep 2013 05:58:40 PM PDT