[meteorite-list] Chelyabinsk trajectory modeling -- how welldid we do? Part 1 of 2

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

From: Jeff Grossman <jngrossman_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 08:58:40 -0400
Message-ID: <52613080.6040709_at_gmail.com>

It will, if and when we get an authoritative report.

Jeff

On 10/17/2013 11:54 PM, Galactic Stone & Ironworks wrote:
> Will the Met Bulletin database entry be updated to reflect the new TKW
> that includes this large mass?
>
> The previous TKW shown in the Bulletin is 100kg and the following
> additional note in the write-up : "The total mass collected by local
> people is certainly >100 kg and perhaps > 500 kg."
>
> Best regards,
>
> MikeG
>
Received on Fri 18 Oct 2013 08:58:40 AM PDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jim Wooddell: "[meteorite-list] Chelyabinsk trajectory modeling -- how welldid we do? Part 1 of 2"
Previous message: Paul H.: "[meteorite-list] Corossol Impact Structure, Quebec, Canada"
In reply to: Galactic Stone & Ironworks: "[meteorite-list] Chelyabinsk trajectory modeling -- how welldid we do? Part 1 of 2"
Next in thread: Mendy Ouzillou: "[meteorite-list] Chelyabinsk trajectory modeling -- how welldid we do? Part 1 of 2"
Reply: Mendy Ouzillou: "[meteorite-list] Chelyabinsk trajectory modeling -- how welldid we do? Part 1 of 2"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

StumbleUpon

del.icio.us

Yahoo MyWeb