[meteorite-list] Targets Scarce for NASA's Asteroid-Capture Mission

From: Ron Baalke <baalke_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <201306181859.r5IIxQuq018584_at_zagami.jpl.nasa.gov>

http://www.space.com/21608-nasa-asteroid-capture-mission-targets.html?cmpid=514648

Targets Scarce for NASA's Asteroid-Capture Mission
by Mike Wall
space.com
18 June 2013

NASA's audacious plan to grab an asteroid and park it near the moon is
short on candidate space rocks at the moment, one researcher says.

It's possible that not a single known object meets the current criteria
of NASA's asteroid redirect mission (ARM), astrodynamical consultant Dan
Adamo said during a presentation with NASA's Future In-Space Operations
working group on Wednesday (June 12).

To pull the mission off in a timely fashion, Adamo added, it may be necessary
to mount a dedicated, space-based asteroid survey in the near future or
consider snagging a chunk of a larger asteroid rather than returning an
entire (relatively small) space rock.

Capturing an asteroid

NASA unveiled the asteroid-retrieval mission in April. The current plan
is to drag a roughly 500-ton, 23-foot-wide (7 meters) asteroid to a stable
orbit near the moon using an unmanned probe.

Astronauts would then visit the object using NASA's Orion capsule and
Space Launch System rocket, which are slated to fly together for the first
time in 2021.

The ARM concept fits within President Barack Obama's vision for NASA's
manned exploration program, which calls for the agency to send astronauts
to a near-Earth asteroid (NEA) by 2025, then on to the vicinity of Mars
by the mid-2030s.

ARM is similar to an idea proposed last year by scientists based at Caltech's
Keck Institute for Space Studies in Pasadena, Calif. The Keck study estimated
that a robotic spacecraft could drag a 23-foot NEA into a high lunar orbit
for $2.6 billion.

Such a mission would help develop asteroid-mining technology and advance
scientists' understanding of the early solar system, advocates say. Capturing
an asteroid could also have big returns in the manned exploration arena.

"Experience gained via human expeditions to the small, returned NEA would
transfer directly to follow-on international expeditions beyond the Earth-moon
system - to other near-Earth asteroids, [the Mars moons] Phobos and Deimos,
Mars and potentially, someday to the main asteroid belt," the Keck team
wrote in a feasibility study of their plan.

Scarce targets

Scientists think at least 1 million asteroids zip through Earth's neighborhood,
but only 10,000 or so of these close-flying space rocks have been identified
and catalogued to date.

Adamo scrutinized the known objects, looking for potential ARM targets.
He first zeroed in on bodies with "sufficiently Earthlike" orbits - nearly
circular paths in much the same plane as Earth, with an average separation
from the sun within 20 percent of the Earth-sun distance (which is about
93 million miles, or 150 million kilometers, and is known as an astronomical
unit, or AU).
Adamo then excluded any asteroids in this group that would zoom past Earth
at too great a speed - more than 4,475 mph (7,200 km/h) relative to Earth
- and came up with a list of 18 "highly accessible" space rocks.

But some of these 18 are definitely too big for ARM as it's currently
envisioned, and many others may not fit the size criterion (estimates
of the space rocks' diameters are generally imprecise).

Further, most of these rocks won't approach Earth closely enough in the
near future to be viable targets. In fact, just seven of the 18 asteroids
will fly within 0.1 AU of Earth before 2030, and only four will do so
before 2021, Adamo said. (This 0.1 AU threshold provides a good rule of
thumb to help narrow down the candidate field, he explained.)

In short, the cupboard is looking pretty bare at the moment, with no slam-dunk
asteroid targets just begging to be captured.

Two strategies could help give ARM the best chance to succeed in the near
future, Adamo said.

The first is to find more potential targets, by launching an asteroid-hunting
space telescope as soon as possible. The second idea involves modifying
ARM to retrieve a chunk of a big asteroid - a 100-ton piece of a 330-foot
(100 m) object, perhaps - rather than an intact small space rock.

There are several advantages to targeting larger near-Earth objects (NEOs),
Adamo said. They're easier to find and track, for example, and are more
likely to exhibit stable and slow rotation.

"Larger NEOs are just going to be easier to approach and get close to,"
Adamo said.

Bigger asteroids are also more likely to be compositionally diverse, offering
a probe several different sampling targets, he added.

"You're like a kid in a candy store instead of just out there with one
object, as the current concept would advocate," Adamo said.

However NASA decides to proceed with ARM, the agency will need to work
quickly if it hopes to execute the bold mission in the next decade or
so, Adamo said. That's especially true if NASA aims to launch a precursor
mission to verify the suitability of an intended target.

"This is a compressed schedule any way you slice it, particularly if you
want some kind of mission assurance," Adamo said.
Received on Tue 18 Jun 2013 02:59:26 PM PDT