[meteorite-list] BLM Law vs Type Sample
From: Michael Mulgrew <mikestang_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 10:23:55 -0700 Message-ID: <CAMseTy3vEWcz91-nQkwKh05H9+b0qV0GKOVB1=WuN+=ZUrxraw_at_mail.gmail.com> List, I approached the BLM for clarification on two specific points: 1) Casual trading of meteorites for other meteorites between individuals and institutions, and 2) Donation/trade of a type specimen for classification purposes. Please allow me to share the results of that inquiry. On item 1, casual trading, I was informed by Lucy Kuizon, BLM National Paleontologist, "...the BLM uses the definition of ?barter? as formally described by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). There are several types of barter, some of which requires the filing of forms to report certain types of exchanges that are considered by the IRS to be reportable income by both parties in the exchange. Usually these parties are small businesses or sole proprietors. Here is an IRS link for reference: http://www.irs.gov/uac/Four-Facts-About-Bartering" Further, she stated [non-commercial trading was a term I used in my initial inquiry], "...?non-commercial trading of meteorites? where (1) it is a one-on-one trade or exchange, and (2) there is no IRS reporting requirement for tax purposes, this is appropriately part of casual or hobby collecting. This is considered personal non-commercial use." As casual collectors we can all continue to trade meteorites we find on public lands for other meteorites as part of the hobby we all enjoy. These trades can no longer include cash, as may be the case for commercial trades, otherwise a permit from the BLM would be required per 43 CFR 2920 regulations. With respect to item 2, type specimens, she wrote: "Your description of ?type specimen? is a type of ?exchange? that is benefitting the science of meteorites. Let me address that concept in each of the type of collecting scenarios. First, under true casual collecting, that is, for non-commercial personal use and no exchange of cash or income-type services, that type of exchange is allowable, and may be considered a donation to the educational or scientific institution. Under the scientific collecting permit, this type of exchange is a little more complex and is not really acceptable. The institution that recovers the meteorite must certify that the meteorite will be curated in that institution in perpetuity. The meteorite is considered federal property under the federal property and accounting laws and regulations. The concept of removing a piece of the meteorite in payment for the services of the agent who recovers it is not a typical action we would allow for other scientifically important resources we issue permits for on public lands, such as cultural artifacts and paleontological resources. Lastly, under a commercial permit, yes, that type of exchange is acceptable, but probably would need to be factored into the fees and rental that would be calculated for the permit. It may possibly lower the amount of the rental being charged. But, that would be at the discretion of the state appraiser. The meteorite professional must communicate this type of exchange clearly to the BLM when applying for a commercial permit because of the influence on the estimate of the rental fees." I replied back that a type specimen would not really be applicable under a scientific collecting permit since the institution will be receiving 100% of the recovered meteorites for study and curation. So good news, we can still trade our meteorites and are still able to donate type specimens for classification purposes. I hope this helps keep a little piece of the sky from falling. Best, Michael in so. Cal. Received on Wed 03 Oct 2012 01:23:55 PM PDT |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |