[meteorite-list] [OT-Off Topic] telescope
From: Galactic Stone & Ironworks <meteoritemike_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:16:21 -0500 Message-ID: <CAKBPJW-6fPBcmPvd=FXF2cMY024jicu3S13LKb6cNAvuukGh2A_at_mail.gmail.com> Hi List, Here is the kind of scope you want for the Moon and casual viewing. ;) http://i268.photobucket.com/albums/jj24/Meteoritethrower/vixen7.jpg Best regards and clear dark skies, MikeG -- ************************************************* Galactic Stone & Ironworks - Meteorites & Amber (Michael Gilmer) Website - http://www.galactic-stone.com Facebook - http://tinyurl.com/42h79my News Feed - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516 Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone *************************************************** On 1/10/12, Peter Scherff <peterscherff at rcn.com> wrote: > Hi John, > > I have a similar rig. I find that I can use it to look at objects on the > horizon. Unfortunately it is a killer when you turn it near the zenith. > Without a diagonal you will kill your neck. > > Thanks, > > Peter > > -----Original Message----- > From: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com > [mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Pict > Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 11:15 AM > To: Benjamin P. Sun; meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] telescope > > Benjamin, > > Haven't had a chance to play with this yet but I just managed to find a > Nikon Lens scope converter. They were discontinued some time ago and are > rare - been looking for a couple of years for a reasonably priced one. You > mount it onto a manual focus F mount telephoto and it turns the lens into a > telescope with a magnification 1/10th the focal length in mm. > > Now I have a 600mm f4, two 1.4X teleconverters, and a 2X teleconverter. So > in theory I could stack all the teleconverters on and have a 2400mm f16 > lens. The front objective on this lens is 160mm in diameter so according to > your rule of thumb it should be good for a useful magnification of > (50/25)x160 = 320, whereas the actual magnification will be 2400/10=240, > well within this. > > I was assuming the lens would be too dark at f16 to see much. Is this setup > comparable to a telescope in the sense that your guidelines for maximum > useable magnification still apply? I'd be delighted to hear that I do have a > chance of it being useable at this magnification. What do you think? It will > be monstrously unwieldy, but I do have a substantial tripod and gimbal head > so should be possible to keep it reasonably steady. > > Regards, > John > > > On 10/01/2012 04:13, "Benjamin P. Sun" <bpsun2009 at gmail.com> wrote: > >>On a limited budget, a small refractor is best for casual planetary and >>lunar viewing. >> >>Small reflectors are more suited for viewing deep space objects, such >>as galaxies and nebulas. >>Avoid reflectors under 100mm in aperture. Their large central >>obstruction from the secondary mirror blocks out too much light. You'd >>get a better, brighter, sharper image through a 60mm refractor than >>through a 80mm reflector. >> >>I started out in astronomy decades ago with a quality 60mm tabletop >>spotting scope with a zoom eyepiece. I could easily see all 4 of >>Jupiters' moons, the rings of Saturn, the orange disk of Mars, the >>phases of Venus, 7 stars of Pleiades, and Orion's nebula with it. >>Ignore all the magnification power hype. A useful magnification >>guideline is 50-60x per inch of aperture. So 60mm(2.4 inches) will >>yield a maximum useful magnification of about 140x. More than enough >>for the casual astronomer. Beyond that magnification and everything >>begins to look crappy, dark and fuzzy. >> >>Remember, even on a low budget, you can still find a good quality >>scope. Look for a coated(multi-coated if you're lucky) air-spaced >>achromatic lens and good multi-element .965" or 1.25" sized eyepieces. >>A finderscope is a non-essential accessory and usually useless junk >>anyways. >>______________________________________________ >>HAPPY HOLIDAYS!! >>Visit the Archives at >>http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html >>Meteorite-list mailing list >>Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com >>http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >> > > > ______________________________________________ > HAPPY HOLIDAYS!! > Visit the Archives at > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4733 - Release Date: 01/09/12 > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4733 - Release Date: 01/09/12 > > ______________________________________________ > HAPPY HOLIDAYS!! > Visit the Archives at > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >Received on Tue 10 Jan 2012 06:16:21 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |