[meteorite-list] Wanted: Meteorites from Mercury
From: Carl Agee <agee_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 06:55:03 -0700 Message-ID: <CADYrzhoL1x3sJ6Q61cq7LyC0OVdtGxSyKNWtOEf33TOZ8u+EQA_at_mail.gmail.com> Sterling makes some good points. The other thing besides trapped atmospheric gases that make the SNC's "planetary" is their relatively young igneous crystallization ages (except for ALH84001) -- indicating geologically long-lived volcanism on a large parent body. All angrites have ancient crystallization ages, in fact SAH99555 has perhaps the oldest crystallization age of any igneous rock in the known solar system. It is assumed that a body of Mercurian size would have at least a billion years of igneous activity and probably longer (like the Moon). If so it might take several 10's of millions of years to form a permanent crust from which to derive meteorites. Hence the "zero age" of angrites do not fit this picture well, more likely a smaller body, but not definitive. On the other hand, neither do the aubrites. As much as I would like our "low-FeO" 1-ton Norton County aubrite to be a Mercurian meteorite, this also seems unlikely because of it ancient age ~4.55 BY. The color argument is a tricky one because we have no idea what causes the Mercurian regolith to be darker than say an aubrite, and this is because of the intense stream of solar wind on rock surfaces which may have a huge on surface coloration. Another thing to remember is that none of the orbiters at Mars have ever spotted a terrain on the martian that is exactly the same as SNC meteorites, so based just on orbital data you would never know SNCs are from Mars -- dust coating is a big problem. There probably isn't as much dust on Mercury, but keep in mind that the interpretation of spectral data from orbit is as much art as it is science and ground-truth calibrations are hard to come by, so knowing the Sun's interaction with the Mercurian regolith maybe just as problematic. This is definitely a work in progress! Of course a NASA sample return mission would be my recommendation! I'm not picky, Mercury, Venus, Mars... Carl Agee --------------------------------------------------- Message: 7 Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 15:44:26 -0600 From: "Sterling K. Webb" <sterling_k_webb at sbcglobal.net> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Wanted: Meteorites from Mercury To: "Galactic Stone & Ironworks" <meteoritemike at gmail.com>, "Stuart McDaniel" <actionshooting at carolina.rr.com> Cc: baalke at zagami.jpl.nasa.gov, meteoritelist meteoritelist <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> Message-ID: <8C3C0F61ACE547BAA3F7E2510550BA80 at ATARIENGINE2> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Hi, You may or may not remember that what made possible the positive identification of Martian meteorites AS Martian meteorites was that we had samples from the Martian surface. No, not rock samples, nor any returned samples, but the isotopic composition of rare gases in the Martian atmosphere, which made a distinctive and unusual signature (particularly for Argon). The SNC's shared this unique signature. It was like a fingerprint. And possible only because we had a lander on the surface.. Mercury has no atmosphere of any consequence and we have no lander there. It's always possible that our present sensing capacity will turn up something as definite, but I can't think of what it could be. Believe me, I've tried. Sterling K. Webb -- Carl B. Agee Director and Curator, Institute of Meteoritics Professor, Earth and Planetary Sciences MSC03 2050 University of New Mexico Albuquerque NM 87131-1126 Tel: (505) 750-7172 Fax: (505) 277-3577 Email: agee at unm.edu http://meteorite.unm.edu/people/carl_agee/Received on Mon 09 Jan 2012 08:55:03 AM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |