[meteorite-list] provenance

From: MexicoDoug <mexicodoug_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:34:09 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <8CEBA2FEB6C4B3D-1E6C-28838_at_angweb-usm022.sysops.aol.com>

"meant for fun not ... silly ... meteorites ... better "

"you love to jump in the time-machine to be there, when Shergotty was
distributed"

Hi Martin,

I'm overly senstitive to all the marketing gimmicks out there, so
please excuse me if I missed the humor the first time through. Your
"meteorite born in the bulletin" comment which I took seriously I guess
then was in reply to my comment about meteorites not having birth
certificates, ok, got it now, and have lightened up a bit for an
awkward smile.

Now as far as the time machine, I've beeen building one in the garage
with this old manual I got on eBay, written by this authentic, nameless
British scientist in the last 19th century who goes by the pseudonym
"Time Traveler"; it's among the rest of my unfinished projects I trip
over trying to take the car out to the market, but I finally realized
that if I do get it built, if nothing else than to clear a walkway to
the door, it would be a much more productive use just to go back and
give myself slaps in the face when I was about to do a few stupid
things - you know, like some old American TV show where two guys drive
a semi and meet people along the road and act as their angels or
another one of those where I just remember the introduction was
inspirational music and a simulate floating in and above the clouds and
some guy who was an angel who still hadn't finished his internship to
be let in.

Better yet, I'd build the time machine in reverse, so instead of
putting old me back in a younger world, it would just fry my own DNA
back to the way it was and have the whole rest of the world travel back
to me, just the way it is today ;-)

What's a few meteorites, you can get the most part of them, from
reputable dealers and honest collectors today if you have a high
frustration threshold, that would be such a waste for a time machine,
you know, parts are more expensive than meteorites in the long run.
Besides, how in the Dickens would I explain the provenance of a
Shergotty I picked up while time traveling? Would I claim the Ghost of
Christmas Past was paid me a visit and dropped it off, or would I just
resubmit it to science for inclusion in the dense strewn fields of time
the editors and committees of the Bulletin will have to work out before
they are even sure they know what to do with the complex world we
already have ;-)
Kindest wishes

Doug




-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Altmann <altmann at meteorite-martin.de>
To: meteorite-list <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Wed, Feb 15, 2012 10:17 am
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] provenance


Hi Doug,

it was meant for fun, not for the silly discrimination which meteorites
would be better than others.

Though for an extreme purist of provenance and pedigree, those new finds
could be indeed ideal.

Cause he is then the founder of the pedigree, able to control the
growth of
the meteorite's family tree, that what he is missing so often with his
historic specimens and their gaps from the day they once were picked up
to
the day he put it in his showcase.

Do you remember still the times of the Dar al Ganis?
There for the collector it was something new and something extremely
thrilling,
that you could become the owner of a complete find or a main mass and no
matter whether it was an old OC.
And that for the same reasons I tried to mention.

Because in the post-Nininger-, post-Huss-, pre-desert-era with its only
2500
meteorites + Antarctics, that was really a difficult task.

And if you remember those desert finds, they had a special prestige too,
Lucky 13, Calcalong, DaG 400, NWA 032...

That opened a new aspect and new possibilities in meteorite collecting.


Well of course it's the individual habit and taste, which particular
meteorites will make the individual collector happy.
Collecting of, in a manner of speaking - "vintage" meteorites - sorry
for
the flat joke, all they have their 4.5 billion years - has without doubt
also very satisfying and interesting aspects.

Though I find also the idea fascinating and attractive, that - although
one
needs certainly some patience - that in 40, 50 years I can say - I
lived and
participated in the Golden Age of the Big Harvest, where so many of the
today so prominent (and desirable) meteorites were recovered.
Aura and patina - just some patience and they will come.

Doug, wouldn't you love to jump in the time-machine to be there, when
Shergotty was distributed, or to gather one of the first
Krinov-Sikhotes -
or to the year, where the now so popular Murchisons were sent for
pennies
around the globe? And I'm convinced, that they in their very beginning
were
as boring for the collectors like today for the historics fan a
Tamdakht or
a Bassikonou is boring.

Huh funny thought, that then in 50, 100 years they could speak about the
people we have here on the list, and it could be well possible, as we
have
an inflation of communication compared to then, that the collectors will
speak about them like today about Foote or Ward and so on.

Meteorites are the oldest matter we can grasp, we are getting old...
If we allow us only a little longer interval on the time bar as a
perspective, instead to pause in the here & now,
then, I tink, these new finds could develop a very thrilling
attractiveness..

Best wishes!
Martin





PS: >That's a new one on me!

And
> Respectfully, who made that rule? "A meteorite is born, when it is
published in the Bulletin."

The convention :-(

Unpublished meteorites tend to get forgotten with time.
And then they are just like those meteorites, which remained unfound.

Note btw. also with the known meteorites and the tkws,
especially the mass finds, that there in the end and quoted since,
were always the weights, once published and overtaken in the Bulletins
respectively in the first Catalogues.
No matter how much was found later on after the first report in
literature.

Or take a more recent fall, like Lampyairie or what his name was.
Hardly anyone remembers it after 10 years, and as it wasn't recorded in
the
Bulletin,
I fear in another 20 years that fall will never have existed.







______________________________________________

Visit the Archives at
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Wed 15 Feb 2012 02:34:09 PM PST