[meteorite-list] provenance
From: Martin Altmann <altmann_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:54:01 +0100 Message-ID: <006d01cceb84$b21bd280$16537780$_at_de> Hmm Don & Doug, if you have such concerns about provenance, you could easily avoid the sorrows. A meteorite is born, when it is published in the Bulletin. So be the second link in the chain. Buy NWAs from the main mass holder given in the Bulletin and Oman and new U.S.-desert finds from the finders listed there. Provenance at its best. That's the true revolution in pedigree-specimens-collecting. Not possible to that degree for 200 years. Be for following generations the seed leaf in the family tree of a meteorite. Best, Martin -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com [mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von MexicoDoug Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Februar 2012 02:26 An: dmerchan at rochester.rr.com; countdeiro at earthlink.net; jasonutas at gmail.com; meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Ebay heads up - Tissint/Scarborough Don M wrote: "A provenance can be traced to the former owner and more questions can then be brought up on the specimens validity." Hi Don, Have you noticed lately we are seeing a number of dealers advertising spectacular falls in micro for weekl on the list? Every time I get excited just to see, Oh, another hammer job... not my cup of tea but delicious anyway. I noticed you had some very nice sub-gram material from Rob Elliot in your last advertised auctions on the list. Now, whenever someone buys a 3 gram specimen from poor Rob and takes the hammer to it, do we get included a free conversation with him that he gave a good deal on it to someone who then proceeded to smash it into a hundred pieces and now as the piece's grandpa has inherited the responsibility to take everyone by the hand, intelligent and "not so much", to explain how the material was originally acquired from the BM? In my opinion, certainly not! The prime sources for this material can't be responsible for every atomic sized piece that falls off the end of a hammer when some buyer gets the idea he is going to be a meteorite speck dealer. I am not inferring you did the hammer maneuver, BTW, but even if you did, regardless of what I think about micros, it is a perfectly legal way to deal whether I like it or not and I have been tempted to bid on your auctions sometimes when they are larger. There can be a fine line between overdoing provenance as a marketing gimmick and using it, in the context of a dozen other factors to make an informed purchase. From your passion and enthusiasm, I suspect keeping provenance sacred is of prime importance. However, unfortunately the authorities to be still aren't issuing meteorite birth certificates, although some have come frightfully close as of late (frightfully, I say because this new strategy completely excludes me as a primary customer due to the price tag attached, all the while kilos are stockpiled for someone's self-directed retirement account. [Now, that I respect, but it strikes me as greedy - note to Doug: put this statement in the opinion section, you have no right to imply this is bad form until you, Doug, are faced with your own private Esquel]) I applaud your enthusiasm but do ask you to consider alternate situations which don't fit your concept of a meteorite passing from hand to hand in a neat little chain, since this is a very complicated can of sardines that doesn't lend itself to blanket statements. As we all know a chain is as strong as its weakest link, and if someone is dishonest it really becomes an issue for independent scientific verification - because then and only then - the stone must speak. No pile of papers unless photo documented in a Dewey decimal system is beyond a con artist's talent in this day and you must come to grips that sometimes asking to see the pier and stilt foundations of an old houseboat isn't going to happen, even while falling in love with the updated cabinetry in the kitchen! The bottom line is, the buyer has the right and obligation to his own wallet to make his own valuation and not lose his head in a speculative excitement. A set of provenance tags works in some cases, but in most cases it doesn't. That was intended to be more analytical than opinionated. Now let me give my opinion: Micros should *never* be purchased for a higher $/g rate than macro specimens. While I always wince when hearing how I must do something to guarantee the future of my children, if I could figure a way to do this, l would say the same thing. Maybe that's one of the non-scientific reasons I am so in love with the Tatahouine meteorite. When you break it - it's worth less, and it is refreshing to know that except for a few talented slicer folk out there experimenting with sections, most of the large pieces will be conserved for posterity, always convincingly recognizable, and this, because the market determined value the way *I said*. Ok, now I apologize, I understand I am lucky to be participating in the meteorite world and I have a debt of gratitude so great to all of my peers and giants before me, that I am not entitled to preach this thought to other good people doing an honest day's work. Kindest wishes Doug PS flame away ;-) ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list Received on Tue 14 Feb 2012 08:54:01 PM PST |
StumbleUpon del.icio.us Yahoo MyWeb |