[meteorite-list] Strange Hollows Discovered on Mercury (MESSENGER)

From: Ron Baalke <baalke_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:11:25 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <201110242211.p9OMBP6w028183_at_zagami.jpl.nasa.gov>

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2011/24oct_sleepyhollows/
      
Strange Hollows Discovered on Mercury
NASA Science News
October 24, 2011

NASA's MESSENGER spacecraft has discovered strange
hollows on the surface of Mercury. Images taken from orbit reveal
thousands of peculiar depressions at a variety of longitudes and
latitudes, ranging in size from 60 feet to over a mile across and 60 to
120 feet deep. No one knows how they got there.

"These hollows were a major surprise," says David Blewett, science team
member from the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.
"We've been thinking of Mercury as a relic - a place that's really not
changing much anymore, except by impact cratering. But the hollows
appear to be younger than the craters in which they are found, and that
means Mercury's surface is still evolving in a surprising way."

Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter spotted similar depressions in the carbon
dioxide ice at Mars' south pole, giving that surface a "swiss cheese"
appearance. But on Mercury they're found in rock and often have bright
interiors and halos.

"We've never seen anything quite like this on a rocky surface."

If you could stand in one of these "sleepy" hollows on Mercury's
surface, you'd find yourself, like Ichabod Crane, in a quiet, still,
haunting place, with a black sky above your head.

"There's essentially no atmosphere on Mercury," explains Blewett. "And
with no atmosphere, wind doesn't blow and rain doesn't fall. So the
hollows weren't carved by wind or water. Other forces must be at work."

As the planet closest to the Sun, Mercury is exposed to fierce heat and
extreme space weather. Blewett believes these factors play a role.

A key clue, he says, is that many of the hollows are associated with
central mounds or mountains inside Mercury's impact craters. These
so-called "peak rings" are thought to be made of material forced up from
the depths by the impact that formed the crater. Excavated material
could be unstable when it finds itself suddenly exposed at Mercury's
surface.

"Certain minerals, for example those that contain sulfur and other
volatiles, would be easily vaporized by the onslaught of heat, solar
wind, and micrometeoroids that Mercury experiences on a daily basis," he
says. "Perhaps sulfur is vaporizing, leaving just the other minerals,
and therefore weakening the rock and making it spongier. Then the rock
would crumble and erode more readily, forming these depressions."

MESSENGER has indeed proven Mercury unexpectedly rich in sulfur. That in
itself is a surprise that's forcing scientists to rethink how Mercury
was formed. The prevailing models suggest that either (1) very early in
Solar System history, during the final sweep-up of the large
planetesimals that formed the planets, a colossal impact tore off much
of Mercury's rocky outer layering; or (2) a hot phase of the early Sun
heated up the surface enough to scorch off the outer layers. In either
case, the elements with a low boiling point - volatiles like sulfur and
potassium - would have been driven off.

But they're still there.

"The old models just don't fit with the new data, so we'll have to look
at other hypotheses."

To figure out how the planets and Solar System came to be, scientists
must understand Mercury.

"It's the anchor at one end of the Solar System. Learning how Mercury
formed will have major implications for the rest of the planets. And
MESSENGER is showing that, up to now, we've been completely wrong about
this little world in so many ways!"

What other surprises does Mercury hold? The sleepy hollows of the
innermost planet may be just the beginning.


Author: Dauna Coulter
Editor: Dr. Tony Phillips
Credit: Science at NASA
Received on Mon 24 Oct 2011 06:11:25 PM PDT