[meteorite-list] Second experiment confirms faster-than-lightparticles

From: Steve Dunklee <steve.dunklee_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 09:49:32 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <1321811372.41638.YahooMailClassic_at_web121320.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>

Relativistic effect 10 nano seconds. clock error 3 to 4 nano seconds. still doesnt add up to the 60 nanosecond difference.
Cheers
Steve Dunklee
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_relativity_on_GPS#Relativity


--- On Sun, 11/20/11, Phil Whitmer <prairiecactus at rtcol.com> wrote:

> From: Phil Whitmer <prairiecactus at rtcol.com>
> Subject: [meteorite-list] Second experiment confirms faster-than-lightparticles
> To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> Date: Sunday, November 20, 2011, 5:42 PM
>
> Hi,
> I downloaded the experimenters' original paper where they
> discuss at great length all the corrections they applied and
> THAT correction is not mentioned nor acknowledged to be
> needed. So, we don't know if they were aware of it or not.
> In this latest news piece, they do not address the
> relativistic analysis. They do address another criticism,
> that of too wide a packet length for the little neutral
> ones.
> They suggest possibly running a fiber the 454 miles between
> the sites, to measure the "light-time." It seems to me that
> if they had accounted for the relativistic effects
> beforehand (and neglected to mention it their paper), they
> would merely say so and have done with it.
> I'm not putting any big money bets on really fast
> neutrinos, not in this frame of reference.
>
> Sterling K. Webb
> ------------------------------------
>
> Sterling,
>
> Could you provide the link to the original paper?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Phil Whitmer
> ______________________________________________
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
Received on Sun 20 Nov 2011 12:49:32 PM PST