[meteorite-list] Mifflin Update... and Real Mifflin Photos...

From: Greg Catterton <star_wars_collector_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 17:01:30 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <547775.26145.qm_at_web46402.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>

That is some of the speculation that it may be a new find, or a planted find. Once I get some of the material returned, I am sending samples to be tested to try to help determine what it is and how long its been on Earth.


Greg Catterton
www.wanderingstarmeteorites.com
IMCA member 4682
On Ebay: http://stores.shop.ebay.com/wanderingstarmeteorites
On Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/WanderingStarMeteorites


--- On Sun, 5/8/11, Richard Montgomery <rickmont at earthlink.net> wrote:

> From: Richard Montgomery <rickmont at earthlink.net>
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Mifflin Update... and Real Mifflin Photos...
> To: "michael cottingham" <mikewren at gilanet.com>, meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> Date: Sunday, May 8, 2011, 7:49 PM
> Hello List and Michael C.
>
> A huge compelling question is what the "fake" Mifflin
> really is....Chergach and Bassikounou have been suggested,
> or any popular H5 for that matter, and this relates to my
> intermediate topic question I posted during this thread with
> topic title "whole stone concerns" ...(I'm still interested
> in a detailed perspective on that as well.)
>
> Michael, 'twould be good to get the "fakes" analyzed asap,
> but I bet you're already well on your way for an
> answer.? How weird it would be to actually be a new
> find?
>
> Richard Montgomery
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "michael cottingham"
> <mikewren at gilanet.com>
> To: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
> Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2011 1:19 PM
> Subject: [meteorite-list] Mifflin Update... and Real
> Mifflin Photos...
>
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Since Jason posted his discovery, 2 more pieces of
> "fake" Mifflin have been recovered. Taking into account cut
> loss, I think I am almost certain that I have recovered 95%
> of the stone that I was duped into buying.? I will not
> be 100% certain until all of the pieces are returned to
> me.? Even though, I have not been 100% refunded for my
> purchase, I feel it is important to refund people's money
> immediately or as fast as possible and to get this fake crap
> off the market and into the trash can... or maybe into a
> lawyer's hand!
> >
> > PLEASE NOTE:? If you have any doubt about a
> Mifflin specimen you obtained from me ...PLEASE send me a
> photo so I can confirm one way or the other. Especially ,if
> it does not look like anything in the Met Bulletin below.
> Even if you did not get it from me, but just want a second
> opinion... send me the photo.
> >
> > Here is also a link to photos of Real Mifflin.
> Everything posted in the Meteoritical Bulletin entry is
> indeed REAL Mifflin.
> >
> > http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?code=52090
> >
> >
> > Best Wishes
> >
> > Michael Cottingham
> > ______________________________________________
> > Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> > Meteorite-list mailing list
> > Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> >
>
> ______________________________________________
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
Received on Sun 08 May 2011 08:01:30 PM PDT